this time, which they needed to back in the 70s. so i think they can and should proceed as they are going about their business, and they should not allow people to get away with just totally stonewalling and obfuscating, diverting attention from the facts that are really at issue here, which are very clear. molly, it s great to have you. let s start with this word stonewalling. it is a proven momentum killer. it works. that s why people employ it. but what counter-strategy are you hearing the democrats may employ? it s hard to say at this point. i think the democrats and the speaker feel they have the momentum with them. we ve seen the support for the impeachment inquiry sort of tick up in the polls. they re also making the argument, it s a sort of difficult argument to make, but they already have what they need. they have the president s words and the white house s own summary of the call. they have the whistleblower complaint, which to a large extent has been corroborated. they
authorization for impeachment at this time, which they needed to back in the 70s. so i think they can and should proceed as they are going about their business, and they should not allow people to get away with just totally stonewalling and obfuscating, diverting attention from the facts that are really at issue here, which are very clear. molly, it s it s great to have you. let s start with this word stonewalling. it is a proven momentum killer. it works. that s why people employ it. but what counter-strategy are you hearing the democrats may employ? it s hard to say at this point. i think the democrats and the speaker feel they have the momentum with them. we ve seen the support for the impeachment inquiry sort of tick up in the polls. they re also making the argument, it s a sort of difficult argument to make, but they already have what they need. they have the president s words and the white house s own summary of the call. they have the whistle-blower