ingraham angle from washington tonight. we have a jam-packed show, including an interview with the parents of an 11-year-old who say their daughter was forced to share a bed with a biological man boy while on a school trip. and how rioters are compared. and poison ivy is tonight s angle. life on campus for jewish students feels like this. i was forced to leave my study group halfway through the semester because my group members told me deserved to die. being a jew at nyu means being physically assaulted while wearing an israeli-american flag and having my attacker roam freely on campus. a mob, many of whom were not law students or harvard affiliates, got into our building chanting phrases. i watched someone hide under a desk. laura: it took a lot of guts for the students to speak out. they did speak out regarding antisemitism at our nation s colleges and universities. shortly after the october 7 massacre, americans have seen what many of us have known for years,
mulvaney. bolton s lawyer cannot there and kupperman woo don t want him against the website because he s saying something that s relevant to the investigation and that will be the most important thing to watch here. whether we end up hearing from john bolton, if not in the house hearings in a senate trial. to that point, in what scenario would that happen? we re hearing this when it gets to the senate as the anticipation is that it will, putting aside that is the most important time in the democratic primary. what would be just the significance of how this plays out? do you get a john bolton out? do you get a trial? i don t think there s any guarantee at this point based upon the process that the house has used that the senate republicans are actually going to go ahead. i can tell you in 1999 and 98
prove to be of use, and congressman zeldin and jordan have tried to suggest that bill taylor, the lead witness, and three decades and bronze star and vietnam and many other things and someone luded by both democrats and republicans, and they said that he is not credible and he and others that have testified negatively about the president are never trumpers. here they are. he s a never trumper and his lawyer s a never trumper. [ inaudible question ] we ll be showing that to you real soon. i think this is an opportunity. i ve been hearing that from many people and other places that the stories of some of these witnesses under cross-examination don t hold up, and this is an opportunity for them to do i think they re going to be polite, but i think they ll be tough. they re going to go after the holes in the stories and
is about the death and dismemberment of this journalist. it gives the message to the saudis they could do whatever they want to their own people and outside their own borders. president trump doesn t care about the saudis murdering somebody in their consulate in turkey. this is a very bad day for dissidents and democrats around the world. the saudis are accused of that murder but woo don t hae d the conclusions yet. what would the u.s. do to make you take back those words? if the saudis have proof that would exonerate they, they should present it but they haven t done that. we should reserve judgment until we have the evidence but the turks seem to have the saudis dead to rights within the consulate. we d want to see some impartial body or the united states have access to that evidence. from what we re seeing, the
that. woo don t. as even be kind of a rational distngs but we do know mr. mum the there s essentially a pay-to-play situation going on here with mr. cohen. it happens in washington and it is a problem for our democracy that maybe we need to think about. the second piece is what does this have to do with respect to criminal liability. mr. trump at this point is in one hot mess with all these people that are so close to him. his own lawyer having relationships, financial relationships with people or entiti entities. the question is rather not whether there s something here but what and what is going to happen to it. it s important to know as we did