greg: it s day five of the kanye apocalypse. as predicted if you step out of the box, the others still in jail will turn on you. so now donald trump has two black friends. they have got. [laughter] i hope ben carson doesn t get jealous. i don t even know what happened here. i think kanye west just realized he is too rich to not be republican. i don t know what it is. we have the right to independent thought and i independently think that kanye has lost his mind guilt gut what an overreaction you would think he advocated for child marriage. it s just like high school. the person who won t act like everyone else gets the shaft. isn t it odd that hollywood lectures us on bullying and the diversified but when it comes right down to it they are group think enforcers intolerant of individuality. why is that?
this will happen. a lot of people think earthquakes are relatively unlikely, but they still take out insurance. let s hope you re not playing that quote back after an effort has been made by the president to fire mueller. fair. but does that mean this is pretty much lights out on it, if that s the mcconnell position? no, i think there continues to be a lot of dialogue back and forth as the president continues to maneuver, to discredit the investigation, the conclusion that he s going to take a shot at it becomes increasingly reasonable. and the sort of almost imaginary confidence that he s never going to do this looks more and more incredible. we have a chess piece on the board that can be moved to protect this investigation at the appropriate time. i think that it s a high-risk right now, and we should move it quickly. the majority leader has more confidence than i do that the president won t act in this way,
every sheriff in america is a border sheriff because every sheriff at every county in every state understands they deal with illegal criminals. look at ms-13. law enforcement knows this. the president, when he came in because he took a strong stance, and now because congress won t act, the democrats are blocking the funding for the wall. he is now moving his words to actions and i think he s doing the right thing. congress needs to fund the border wall. julie, we don t need it over every inch of the border. we have 1200 miles, there s some natural barriers. you can do it electronically in some areas but where we have big cities, the major crossings, that s where we need the wall to extend miles out. when they cross they are, they melt into the population. they are hard to spot. they are out in no-man s-land, we can get them but we need the wall especially around those major border crossings. julie: dan patrick,
connecticut to buy a gun, they don t have that information. so if the federal government won t act and you can t get a 50-state solution well, then get what you can. and start with state coalitions and that s exactly what we re doing now we have databases on mental health, on protective orders. we have databases on warrants for arrests, all of which would stop a purchaser in the state of new york. share those databases with the other states, so you re take wack are good laws and you are now expanding the foot print of that to a northeast coalition. what do you expect to be the financial implications of this pact among these four states? do you expect you will need a lot of new funding to be approved by the legislature, for example, in your is that it to get this going? money is tight especially after what the federal
after the sandy hook massacre in connecticut, new york passed a sensible gun controlled bill called the safe act which has the model reforms that we ve been looking for. connecticut has good laws, rhode island has good laws, new jersey has good laws. the problem is, you re limited by your own borders. so i can enforce those laws and i have that data in my state but if somebody drives across the border and goes to connecticut to buy a gun, they don t that information so if the federal government won t act and you can t get a 50-state solution well then get what you can and start with state coalitions and that s exactly what we re doing now. we have databases on mental health, we have databases on protective orders, we have databases on warrants for arrest, all of which would stop a purchaser in the state of new york. share those databases with the