didn t apply in the way the terminated employee wanted it to apply in that case but you applied it fairly in the other case. also wanted to bring your attention to another case mentioned by some of my colleagues and that s the wong case. case where a professor with cancer wanted to extend her leave, the university said no, and the professor sued. the panel ultimately concluded that the law required her to show that she could continue to perform her job if the university provided an accommodation and all the parties in that case agreed she could not. that she couldn t continue to perform it. that as i recall was a unanimous opinion, is that correct? senator, that was another very hard case to go home after. the individual there had was
the same statute that was involved in the trans am case it s a 2007 case. called co-park versus administrative review board. a trucker had been fired refusing to drive a truck he considered unsafe. you wrote an opinion in favor of the trucker and awarding attorneys fees sthais that righ? senator, your recollection is better than mine on attorneys fees. as i recall the court did award attorneys fees in that case. so, i don t really understand the argument that some are making or the implications some are trying to raise that you were somehow unfair in the trans am case. because after all, in the trans am case, you applied the law, it
it didn t apply in the way the terminated employee wanted it to apply in that case. but you applied it fairly in the other case. i also wanted to bring your attention to another case that s been menksed by some of my colleagues. and that s the wong case. it is a case where a professor with cancer wanted to extend her leave. the university said no. and the professor sued. the panel ultimately concluded that the law required her to show that she could continue to perform her job if the university provided an accommodation. and all the parties in that case agreed that she could not, that she couldn t continue to perform it. that, as i recall, was a unanimous opinion; is that correct? senator, that was another very hard case to go home after. the individual there had was