we know that s one of the reasons why he s on the supreme court. i think this is tantamount to sticking a dagger in our back. we will gun to see a kind of segregated higher education landscape. we re going to see that become wider and wider. what s next, gay marriagesome. is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows? [laughter] no women in colleges. we can dream. i joke. [laughter] and biden wasn t done sobbing, running over to the safe pace of msnbc. i find it just so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. do you to worry that that without court reform this conservative majority is too young and too conservative, that they might do too much harm? i think they may do too much harm. i think that some of the court are beginning to the realize their legitimacy is being questioned in ways that it hasn t been questioned e in the past. he ended that interview the only way he knows how, but with by awkwardly shuffling off th
court ruling that didn t go his way. top court dealing with affirmative action. that means merit agains and the media will need a fainting couch. the worst thing about affirmative action is that it created a clarence thomas. clarence thomas has criticized affirmative action and we know that s why he s on the supreme court. i think this is sticking dag dag dager in our back. we will see that segregation become wider and wider. what s next, gay marriage? is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows. no women in college. we can dream. i joke. biden wasn t done sobbing running over to the safe space of msnbc. find it so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. do you worry without court reform this conservative majority is too young and too conservative that they might do too much harm? i think they may do too much harm. ink some of the court are beginning to realize their legitimacy is being questioned in ways it had not bee
that. would you argue that legacy should go away too? affirmative action dose away, why not legacy? it depends if jesse s going to [laughter] i knew he was going to say that. but you should look at class. you should look at class because it s more socioeconomic than anything. there s so many poor, white americans that are denied opportunities just the way black americans are because they don t have the income, they don t have the access to elite schools in order to spring from a private boarding school into harvard. you have to accept that. but the supreme court is not getting involved in it. but going back, it starts before that. i think that s why starts in the home. yeah. it starts in grade school is. judge, nancy pelosi said this is why we need term limits, and this is from a person who won t leave congress unless she s in a hearse. [laughter] yeah. and doesn t want feinstein to leave either. yes. [laughter] you know, this decision will be the dobbs decision
democrats are going to to use this the way they used dobbs in 2022. it s very simple. affirmative action admission policies violate the equal protection clause of the united states constitution. the. th amendment. the 14th amendment. the 14th amendment was drafted in the wake of the civil war when congress said no one should be denied equal protection if of the law. so if you follow the genesis of where this started and then you go to plessy and then you to go to brown v. board of education and those famous supreme court cases, the court has consistently tried to make it a level playing field. so the color does not add or take away from the ability to get a good education. and as sandra day o connor said, you know, she assumed at some point it was going to go away. when is it time for this to go away. it s time for this to go away when we live in a society now that is so focused on not just
lever either. democrats will use this the way they used dobbs in 2022. it s simple. affirmative action admission policies violate the equal protection clause. the 14th amendment was drafted in the wake of the civil war when congress said no one should be denied the equal protection of the law. if you follow the genesis of where this started and then you go to brown versus board of education and those supreme court case, the court has tried to make it a level playing field so the color does not add or take away from the ability to get a good education. as sandra day o connor said she assumed at some point it was going to go away. when is it time for this to go away. it s time to go away when we live in a society that s so