hour. and we are also awaiting the release of the final report of the january 6th investigation in congress. holding their final public meeting monday. the big news from the meeting was that they approve criminal referrals of former president trump to the u.s. justice department on four separate federal felony charges. including insurrection. which is a ten-year felony. but while we wait for the final report. which we think will come tomorrow. that said, this morning we woke up thinking would be today. so don t hold me to. it will be for the final report. we expected six on, 87, eight under, nine pages. tonight, before that gets here, the investigators released transcripts, 34 transcripts of witness interview they conducted over the course of the investigation. and it s from an interesting mix of people. the transcripts including witnesses like john eastman, trump lawyer john eastman who was in part responsible for coming up with a plan to pressure vice president mike pence that he per
question? griff: sure. brian: thanks. this person worked underneath peter strzok. that was left out of the the washington post story, wasn t it? well, listen, there are multiple news organizations reporting on this. as you know, this is a town that leaks a lot. that one of the things being alleged and that certainly would bring mr. strzok s name back into this long-running story. ainsley: it s interesting. the washington post originally reported that he did work under peter strzok or he or she did and then they retracted that a few hours later around midnight. steve: so we don t know. maybe it was wrong. ainsley: correct. or incorrect. steve: at the same time attention is being brought to this person who is a low level fbi lawyer according to the the washington post story that is still up on their website. we have had that s one thing. we have also had members of congress who have suggested that there is growing evidence that people at the fbi changed the 302 witness intervie
notice when a report is coming. along the lines you ve been asking, i will seek at the earliest instance to provide to the special counsel s office, if they re not public already, transcripts of witness interview so the special counsel can have the benefit of that evidence but also so the special counsel can determine whether people knowingly willingly committed perjury before our committee. we sought to do that already. the republicans, for whatever reason, decided they will protect witnesses even that they may believe have committed perjury before our committee. that will change as well. adam schiff, the incoming chairman of the intelligence committee. still results. i want to bring in steve. what is the count in arizona? it will take days and bleed into next week. everyday we re getting updates
jeopardize our national security. we may at the point we take the gavel have a report by bob mueller. we may not. at the end of the day we need to continue to pledge what we said we would do from the outset, follow the facts wherever they lead. final question because you mentioned it, do you have any interaction with the special counsel s office or any way of knowing when and if a report would be coming? i don t expect to get advance notice when a report is coming. along the lines you ve been asking, i will seek at the earliest instance to provide to the special counsel s office, if they re not public already, transcripts of witness interview so the special counsel can have the benefit of that evidence but also so the special counsel can determine whether people knowingly willingly committed perjury before our committee. we sought to do that already. the republicans, for whatever reason, decided they will protect witnesses even that they