know, with a coordinated, widespread effort against these pro-life centers, maternal care centers, christian churches and the home of supreme court justices, the department of justice is nowhere to be found . it s not just that they haven t condemned it. there was also the statement that came out where where the department of justice reminded everybody that , you know, protest is totally fine. that s something that actually should have been condemned from the mouth of the department of justice why they re allowed to be the justices homes at all. it s actually against the law. but why is it intimidation? i would say, molly, they are setting the stage for something really horrible to happen to one of these supreme court justices by not clearing these people out as the law allows for. it is horrifying and it s it is a miracle that nothing worse has happened. now, i don t think people realize how bad that attempted assassination at justice kavanagh s house was the man who had detailed plan
protests are peaceful. yes,s. my house is there ses protest three or four times a week outside my house. that s the american way toay peacefully protest is okay,. w, and i ve been.n. that s my wife. sorry. maybe there s a protest that i doubtbt chuck schumer s home is h having protests three or four times a week. not only that, schumer refused to condemn this kind of t intimidation, this type of harassment, but so did biden s white house. take a look at this .s so i know that there s an outrage right now. i guessnow , about protestsav that have been peaceful to date and we certainly continue tout encourage that outside of judges homes. wewe have young kids by theirr neighbors are not all public figures. so would the president think about waiving all activities that want to go into residential neighborhoods in virginia and maryland, peter ? look, i think our view here is that peaceful protest t. ry there s a long history in the united states in the country of that . so we don t care
they will murder you. where are humanri rightsd activists and all of ave this because they should be agreeing. we don t agree on everything, but we agree on thisry. we agree that rights are god given natural rights from god, not from government. and these fundamental rights do not exist for these groups in afghanistan and yet you don t hear a peep out of most people, piers. nothing. nothing. and you know, we hear a lot f from big corporations like disney when they want to you signal down in florida about sex education to young kids butk not a word from them about the oppression of millions of afghani women in afghanistanaf because of course it was a democrat president. they created this fiasco that shows a political bias for all these corporations, not the best corda he got about thid of thing. let me switch gears to the issue of doxxing and the protesting. i call it intimidation and harassment of supreme supreme court justices. i would imaginesupr that we migt
big, big words, though. big words. police, blackmail. i thought you were going to say that wragg lost his rag, but she didn t. so, i got to say it. yeah, there are very difficult conversations, very tough conversations and yes, we all know, if you re in westminster, we all know that sometimes party whips, and i am not singling out any political party in particular, do make, cajole, strong arm, twist arms, persuade and sometimes dangle, what some people michael warnings, what some people might call threats, often enticements, vote with us in this tricky time, i know it is very difficult, maybe there will be a place for you as minister for paperclips next time around. to call it intimidation and blackmail, blimey, that is a very incendiary claim to make. other people have you know, it is complete nonsense, basically overblowing the situation, but it is interesting because again it shows us, even though he is a critic of boris johnson, it shows us that downing street cannot control what t
of commons and the commissionerl of the metropolitan police. goodness me! big, big words, though. big words. police, blackmail. i thought you were going to say that wragg lost his rag, but she didn t. so, i got to say it. yeah, there are very difficult conversations, very tough conversations and yes, we all know, if you re in westminster, we all know that sometimes party whips, and i am not singling out any political party in particular, do make, cajole, strong arm, twist arms, persuade and sometimes dangle, what some people might call warnings, what some people might call threats, often enticements, vote with us in this tricky time, i know it is very difficult, maybe there will be a place for you as minister for paperclips next time around. to call it intimidation and blackmail, blimey, that is a very incendiary claim to make. other people have said, you know,