joining me now is charlie rowley, former special advisor to the uk s levelling up secretary michael gove. some of the allegations were upheld but he is clearly not going quietly. he has called the process flowed and says it is unfair. what do you make of the fact he has not accepted the findings? i of the fact he has not accepted the findin . s? ~ of the fact he has not accepted the findinus? ~ 3 of the fact he has not accepted the findinus? ~ , ,., ., ., findings? i think it s important to acce -t it findings? i think it s important to accept it was findings? i think it s important to accept it was dominic findings? i think it s important to accept it was dominic raab - findings? i think it s important to l accept it was dominic raab himself or called for the inquiry and he was very clear that if he was found to have fallen below the standards expected of him that he would resign and that is what is done. is he right to criticise? he feels, the frustration from his point of view,
the potential moral feelings here, beyond the legal issues, alleging that fox pressured he into providing misleadin testimony. just the overall world feeling that we are seeing here. i think one thing that came out this week that was ver important is that fox has unit called the brain room and this unit is charged wit fact checking what goes on the air. so there were some people at fox who thought it was important that they didn t jus put bs out there and a bunch o lies especially on something as important as who won the presidential election. ten days after the election, the brain room sent it findings to fox management saying that this was all bs. and they should not put any of it on the air because it was untrue so to go tear question, mora feeling here is a news organization which for money to keep it -
presidential election. ten day after the election, the brai room sent its findings to fo management saying that this wa all bs. and they should not pu any of it on the air because i was untrue. especially o something as important as wh won the presidential election. ten days after the election, the brain room sent it findings to fox management saying that this was all bs. and they should not put any of it on the air because it was untrue. so to go tear question moral feeling here is a news organization which for money to keep it which tucker carlson makes very clear, here is the motive. they re losin viewers, the maga viewers, because they are not lying t them. so to keep their stock price up they go forward wit allies. what could be a bigger moral failure than that?
techniques. methods and the specialist techniaues. . , techniques. finally, when will we see what has techniques. finally, when will we see what has been techniques. finally, when will we see what has been included - techniques. finally, when will we see what has been included to i techniques. finally, when will we i see what has been included to come through in general society, the findings of your survey in general society? t findings of your survey in general socie ? ~ , findings of your survey in general socie ? ~ , ., ., ., society? i think there s a lot of recommendations society? i think there s a lot of recommendations in society? i think there s a lot of recommendations in the i society? i think there s a lot of. recommendations in the report, society? i think there s a lot of i recommendations in the report, if we see all of them implemented, it would take a long time of the government has already done as amended this intense bill to introduce this general commi
Unprecedented Claims Reprocessing Order Stayed Pending Appeal to the Ninth Circuit
On February 1, 2021, Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero entered final judgment in
Wit v. United Behavioral Health, No. 3:14-cv-2346 (N.D. Cal.).
Wit is an ERISA class action concerning the propriety of certain guidelines previously used by United Behavioral Health (UBH) when adjudicating claims for outpatient and residential inpatient behavioral health treatments. The
Wit court appointed a special master to oversee UBH’s compliance with the monumental task of “reprocessing” more than 67,000 claims for mental health treatment, as well as with other detailed declaratory and injunctive remedies. This “Health Update” reviews developments in the