jordan obtaining testimony fro a former prosecutor who worked for alvin bragg. that became a pretty hotly argued motion today in federal court. the judge ruled very quickly so quickly that it s very clea that the opinion was written before the argument took place also later, in the hour, mor importantly merrick s gonn join us, the attorne representing ralph yarl, the 1 year old shot twice for ringin the wrong doorbell and o course as you know, ralph is a home, under the care of hi mother, who is a nurse, so the first thing will find out is how ralph is doing, and then we ll find out more about th status of that case. those are really importan voices on a night like this, lawrence sounds like a good joe thank you today a trump appointed federal judge in manhattan deciding whether to block subpoena by jim jordan to former prosecutor in manhattan district attorney alvin bragg office, and in that case the trump judge accused one of the sides in the case of engagin in what
often talk about what happening with the question of jim jordan obtaining testimony from a former prosecutor who worked for alvin bragg that became a pretty hotly argued motion today in federal court. the judge ruled very quickly so quickly that it s very clea that the opinion was written before the argument took place also later in the hour, more important, lee merritt is gonn join us, the attorne representing ralph yarl, the 1 year old shot twice for ringin the wrong doorbell and o course as you know, ralph is a home, under the care of hi mother, who is a nurse, so the first thing will find out is how ralph is doing, and then we ll find out more about th status of that case. those are really importan voices on a night like this, lawrence sounds like a good show. thank you, alex goodnight today, a trump appointe federal judge in manhattan deciding whether to block subpoena by jim jordan to former prosecutor in manhattan district attorney alvin bragg office, and in
of the motivation of jim jordan jim jordan s heating trump s call to interfere in mandatory s prosecution. and the capper for me was on pointed to, lawrence, when the judge in wows one wonderland fashion says no one is above the law while essentiall trying to place the former president above the law. so i don t know what happens tomorrow, whether the winner shows, up whether they expec to prevail on appeal, whethe they nonetheless show up and answer some or all questions but i don t think this is th end of the litigation over this andrew weissmann, i jus want to be clear about this. the opinion itself, i don find the actual opinion itself outrageous i find it to be just wildl rhetorically out of control on its way to some positions that are defensible, their lega duty defensible and could ve been weighed in a much mor
s prosecution and the capper for me was on pointed to, lawrence, when the judge in wows one and the for me complete alic in wonderland fashion says n one is above the law while essentially trying to place th former president above the law so i don t know what happens tomorrow, whether the winner shows, up whether they expec to prevail on appeal, whethe they nonetheless show up and answer some or all questions but i don t think this is th end of the litigation over this andrew weissmann, i jus want to be clear about this. that the opinion itself, i don t find the actual opinio itself outrageous. i find it to be just wildl rhetorically out of control on its way to some positions that are defensible, their lega duty defensible and could ve been weighed in a much mor modest way, and in a shorter