he folded quickly. i think that would be telling to see how he actually runs or if he does run when things get a little more complicated. that raises an interesting question on some of his social policies. they may be popular in florida, maybe. we ll see the next election. but they re not going to be as popular around the country, certainly not in a handful of states that he would need to win if he wanted to be president. do you expect that after seeing this and the criticism he faced with this, he might change his ways as a general on some of the social stuff? i think what we have to understand of ron desantis at this point, he knows how to read a poll. florida, an eye towards winning the republican nomination. i think he s well aware he would have to win the general. ron desantis has been able to attract a lot of support. he gives everybody who s a trump fan what they want, but it s almost with a little bit of a wink wink nod nod to the rest of the republican party. i ll make you
going to conduct hearings when he s already stated the report is his testimony and has nothing further to add? i would echo that sentiment and have the same question myself. i question why he ever gave a press conference in the first place. we now his office was shutting down by the fact the report had been turned in. you had attorney general barr and rod rosenstein make the decision not to move forward on obstruction of justice. he also contradicted himself by originally saying he would have cleared the president if he could have while saying he decided he wasn t going to reach a conclusion and giving a wink wink nod nod to the democrats saying it s congress duty to find wrongdoing of a sitting president. i think it reason he gave it
going to conduct hearings when he s already stated the report is his testimony and has nothing further to add? i would echo that sentiment and have the same question myself. i question why he ever gave a press conference in the first place. we now his office was shutting down by the fact the report had been turned in. you had attorney general barr and rod rosenstein make the decision not to move forward on obstruction of justice. he also contradicted himself by originally saying he would have cleared the president if he could have while saying he decided he wasn t going to reach a conclusion and giving a wink wink nod nod to the democrats saying it s congress duty to find wrongdoing of a sitting
going to conduct hearings when he s already stated the report is his testimony and has nothing further to add? i would echo that sentiment and have the same question myself. i question why he ever gave a press conference in the first place. we now his office was shutting down by the fact the report had been turned in. you had attorney general barr and rod rosenstein make the decision not to move forward on obstruction of justice. he also contradicted himself by originally saying he would have cleared the president if he could have while saying he decided he wasn t going to reach a conclusion and giving a wink wink nod nod to the democrats saying it s congress duty to find wrongdoing of a sitting president. i think it reason he gave it
committee to buy influence? it s to try it s a little like saying there s gambling at rick s casino. of course. you re exactly right, but look, the issue is that you re right. the whole concept and the whole way the inaugural system is done is maybe needs to be they need to take a look at it, but there are rules. and there are guidelines. and there are laws. and something as simple as like what shimon was mentioning, potentially a straw donor, if that happened even once, that s a big problem. but the other thing is, okay, let s say they tried to buy influence. they want the subpoena calls for e-mails, text messages and other things. there s buying influence and then there s buying influence. there s a wink wink nod nod, and then there s an actual request for a quid pro quo that might be a little more clear and illegal. we don t know if donald trump