Feeling the torrent of emotions i could say was the first time i felt like this. And i want to give my remarks in a different way because the nays we are hearing shouted on streets, george floyd, amman avery, rhianna taylor, so many nays of people we did not know as a nation. They were not household nays. Their nays now are mixed into nays that we have e heard throughout my entire lifetime. The nays mixed with horror and sadness and tragedy does not speak to their beauty i just want to say ahmaud was a man he was 25 years old he was murdered he went out jogging or he was hunted by two white men who walked free for weeks after killing him. This man, this child of god, his loved ones talked about his humanity they said he was a loving son, brother, and uncured at nephew a cousin of friend he was humbled, he was kind, he was well mannered, he always made sure he never departed from his loved ones without saying the words without saying i love you. Rhianna taylor, before we knew her name,
He was 25 years old when he was murdered. He went out jogging. He was hunted by two white men who walked free for weeks after killing him. This man, this child of god, his loved ones talked to his humanity. They said he was a loving son, a brother, and uncle, a nephew, a cousin and a friend. He was humble. He was kind. He was well mannered. He always made sure that he never departed his loved ones without saying the words, without saying, i love you. Breonna taylor, before we knew her name, extraordinary american, extraordinary servant. She was a First Responder in a pandemic, like so many of our First Responders, she showed a courage, humble heroism. She was 26 years old when she was shot and killed by police, asleep in her home. An emergency medical technician in louisville. Her loved ones too shared the truth of her spirit. They said Breonna Taylor was full of life. She loved social gatherings with her friends and especially her family. She loved life and all it had to offer. She co
The presiding officer the senator from illinois. Ms. Duckworth as if in legislative session, i ask unanimous consent that the Senate Judiciary committee be discharged from further consideration of senate bill 1938 and the senate proceed to its further consideration. Further, that the bill be read a third time and passed and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The presiding officer is there objection . Mr. Graham yes. The presiding officer the senator from South Carolina. Mr. Graham senator duckworth, i think we can probably get there if we talk. We got this thing at 5 30 last night. Its a Grant Program to try to drive better policing, less bias. I get that. Count me in for that concept. There is a civilian review process about prosecutorial decisions. I dont quite understand it. Senator lee came up and asked me questions about the bill. With no animosity, i object at this time. I hope we can get it part of a bro
Thank you so much for hearing our appeal. Happy birthday. Im sorry were this is taking up your item. Time. Here is the block we live on. Our house is in the middle here. And mr. Lees house is on the right. This is the first subdivision in San Francisco. We made good effort to solve this problem with mr. Lee. He has been unwilling to compromise or find a solution. He says he needs a window for ventilation and as a fire exit. Both are which are illegal uses of Property Line window. This is the Property Line window. Our goal is to treat the permit like a new window. For several years thats what i was told would happen by the preservation folks at the Planning Department. Heres the permit. You see the permit. Unfortunately you dont see this on the screen. These are joe duffys notes about the permit. When i heard it was happening it was crazy. We filed a complaint with d. B. I. Mr. Lee was able to walk down the dbi to get a permit to change the window. Mr. Duffy made all kinds of note about
Ourselves. We are not scientists. For us to review a bible like this or to review thats nice, ill accept the data. I dont know. Maybe youre suggestion is correct one. As we sit right now with the advice that you are projecting to us, im not dismissing your advice and counsel. I know the law because we experience on a weekly basis. We might as well save the public the filing fee for the appeals if its the appeal includes any identifications as health is an issue. We can just dismiss it because wash our hands and by saying, f. E. C. , were not in control. My personal conscious wont allow me to do that. Again, we can tell the chances are slim or none because San Francisco Health Department, this is not an attack, does not want to take up this issue and does not want to fight federal statute. You can understand the position. Sure. President swig we want to protect people. I hear what youre coming from. I will take issue with your statement that the Health Department doesnt want to take on