Versus regions of the university of california and related cases. General francisco, general francisco. In 2017, the fifth circuit held that dhaka and expansion were likely unlawful. Face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security determined that it no longer wish to retain the policy based on its belief that the policy was illegal, has doubt about its illegality, and its general opposition to broad, nonenforcement policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. Previousion ended a nonenforcement policy by which the department agreed to not enforce the ima against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. The decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the unreviewable discretion, unless the statute restricts it. Nothing in the ina requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency, do not enforce the law. Decision to and this nonenforcement policy was reasonable. Dr. Was a temporary measure that on
Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio
The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussion unles
Policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The decision ended a nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce it against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agencys discretion unless it restricts it and nothing requires the department , a Law Enforcement agency, to not enforce the law. Second, this was reasonable. Daca was a measure that could be rescinded at any time, and the departments reasonable concern about its legality and its general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies provided more than a reasonable basis for ending it. After all, an agency is not required to push its legally dubious power to not enforce the law to its logical extreme. Undermines competency in the rule of law itself and conflicts with the agencies Law Enforcement mission. I would like to begin with the review ability question. If the attorne
Just another day of Sexual Harassment allegations, this time on capitol hill with senator al franken pleading for forgiveness today but also resisting calls to step down. All comes the House Minority leader nancy pelosi to take the heat defending john conyers calling him an icon. And then just a crazy case of whos the boss in washington. Mcmulvaney speaks out. Well hear from him in just a moment. Hes the current budget director, and hes also been pointed the acting director of a giant Consumer Protection agency. But heres the thing. Theres a lawsuit challenging that. Essentially leaving two people fighting over one job. What a mess. Tonight, an allstar lineup to cover it all. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee kicks it off, katrina pearson, the Weekly Standards fred barns, and conservative millenial, theyre all here tonight. Im connell mcshane, this is risk and reward. And on wall street today, well, the dow hit an alltime high. At least intraday. It did not close at a record. Came