and all indications for but supreme court not going to side for trump on this. these are pretty much bogus, executive privilege claims. and so, ordinarily, you might expect the court to hear. because it is such a grave matter. but he, because the arguments of team trump or so bad. i think that the thinking is, they won t even hear them. neil, what is your reading of the subpoenas. that the committee issued today? very important lawrence. some legal teams win buckets of jury verdicts. others, like donald trump s, win buckets of subpoenas. and i m so glad to see the committee do this. it is honoring the truth seeking function. it is a really rare thing to subpoena a lawyer. and honestly i d be uncomfortable with it, if these folks were acting truly as lawyers. a lot agreed does not shield an inquiry, if you are a coconspirator, or coup plotter. or have ongoing criminal
these subpoenas that that the committee issued today? very, very important, lawrence. you know, some legal teams win buckets of jury verdicts and others like donald trumps win buckets of subpoenas that and i m glad to see the committee do this. it s honoring truth seeking function. it s rare to subpoena a lawyer. i would be uncomfortable if these folks were acting truly as lawyers but a law degree doesn t shield your inquiry if you re a co-conspirator or plotter or have on going criminal activity so i think for these lawyers, you know, like rudy giuliani, this attorney client privilege they re starting to advance now is a double edged sword because on the one hand, these four folks hope to keep their shield their actions from public scrutiny but on the other, they have to defend what they were doing as bonefied legal advice and if you have any doubt about