I think we need to think through, to me also is more this position we need to have all 19 people at the table 47 days from now, and maybe this is something, if you need to tag team with somebody else on the counsel, one of the first things i kind of want to talk through is potentially how removal affects this. So i know your estate is currently litigating this issue with multiple codefendants in federal court. And while that is happening until a decision is made, we cant issue a judgment of conviction here. Yes, judge. No matter how judge rules, isnt either party going to have right to appeal that rule something. Thats correct. Both sides would have the right to appeal. So the 11th circuit could take, any idea of how long to weigh in . As long as they need to. Right. So it could potentially even optimistically be a six month turn around for the 11th circuit to come up with a decision, right . Yes, sir. If its a fourmonth trial, this starts in october, we present the entire states case,
Case and may not be in others, right . Yes, your honor. So i guess some of the things i think we need to think through, to me also, its more this position that we still need to have all 19 people at the table 47 days from now. And maybe this is something if you need to tag team with somebody else on the counsel. I want to talk about how removal affects this. So i know youre a state your state is currently litigating this issue with multiple codefendants in Federal Court. And while thats happening, until its a decision a decision is made, we cant issue a judgment of conviction here, right . Yes, judge. Now, no matter how judge jones rules, isnt either party going to have the right to appeal that ruling . That is correct, judge. Our positions would be both sides have the right to appeal. The 11th circuit could take any idea of how long to weigh . As long as they need to. Right. Could potentially even optimistically be a sixmonth turnaround for the 11th circuit to come up with a decision.
chairman really delayed any sort of public examination of the willingham case. but this is dealing with when or not that execution was justified or not. yeah, the idea of the commission was just to look at problems and find a way not to have it ever happen again. there seems to be a lot of conflict between texas politics and science. thank you both for joining us to talk about your documentary now being shown in theaters. for more information, go to incendiary movie.com. herman cain doesn t think racism in america holds anybody back in a big way. i ll introduce him to the facts next.
prisoners, he rather expertly turns even a question about it around into an opportunity to get the crowd to root for him. to root for him essentially in unison against these kinds of monsters who are coming into texas and doing monstrous things to find themselves on death row. it s the same way governor perry handled it during the hutchison case when she brought up the willingham case. if you oppose the death penalty for someone who murdered his three children and beat his wife and forced her to have an abortion and changed his story and confessed and last words was a tirade about this is ex-wife and it was held up nine times by federal courts, then they should just say so. the idea was, what are you, on his side, this monster? you re worried about this guy s execution? that means you re on this moen
insurance. it s a fact. ron paul s own campaign manager we learned there was a piece this week he died from medical complications. did not have health insurance. had $400,000 in medical debt. it causes people to die to not have health insurance. it doesn t necessarily kill you right away but data shows us this is a very real thing. number one cause of bankruptcy in the country. and the idea that churches or charities is going to step is just not the case. in some cases they ll do what they can. in most cases they re not even going to be around. people are just going to die. the idea that you have a bake sale to help someone who is dying, that s not policy. i think what ron paul admits to is someone has to take care of them. he wants it to be charity. what i thought was interesting about the question which was clever from wolf blitzer. the scenario that he sketched out is exactly the justification for the individual mandate, right? that s the reason we have the