radical feminism. this was a major republican theme in 1992. hillary clinton as the radical anti-family feminist lawyer and kept up after bill clinton won the election for most of the 1990s hard to tell which clinton the right despised more. sometimes it was bill like when north carolina senator jesse helms suggested the president better have a body guard if he visited his state. or when robert dornen a republican congressman from california said of bill clinton quote the thought makes me sick to have this s.o.b. except he didn t say s.o.b. of low character commanding this country. other times it was hilary who bothered the right more when william sapphire wrote in 1996 americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization our first lady is a congenital liar. there was a sort of backward working logic that prevailed on the right in the 1990s.
an end result that the president wants and frankly i want, and i think over two-thirds of the country if you do believe these polls as well. do you then then his language on wednesday when he invoked his declaration of i wanted penicillin i was speaking i think frank rich is a friend. i think the comparison between slavery and people holding on, i think you would be intpd. you would find a number of african-americans in the south who would cling to this idea as well. that gun rights are important. now, do people believe the gun rights in killing in newtown are equivalent? of course not. that s the moment, to your point, about inflexion. that s where the focus has to be in washington. i think the president, the most powerful imagery used were those children, the fact that people saw their own kids and their own nieces and nephews and grandchildren is the most compelling and powerful and instructive in the debate so far. as far as frank s point, though, i m not sure he is making
freecreditscore.com. you talk to anyone in washington and they will tell you the next two rush hour traffic on the beltway and snow, the thing everyone in d.c. fears most is the national rifle association, the nra, they are unrivalled in the power to shamelessly stick to its guns, sorry, sorry, and ultimately get what it wants, but it was not always this way. in 1969, then-president richard nixon, a republican, as you may remember, told the late journalist william sapphire that guns were an abomb nation. he wanted to make handguns illegal. he later joined ronald reagan in support of the brady bill, which the nra opposed. george h.w. bush, republican, made it illegal to import assault weapons. there was a time in modern
washington and they will tell you that next to rush hour traffic on the beltway and snow, the thing everyone in d.c. fears most is the national rifle association, the nra, they are unrivalled in the power to scare and strongarm and shamelessly stick to its guns, sorry, sorry, and ultimately get what it wants. but it was not always this way. in 1969, then-president richard nixon, a republican, as you may remember, told the late journalist william sapphire that guns were an abomination. he wanted to make handguns illegal. years later, he joined ronald reagan, also, a republican, in support of the brady bill, which the nra spriedantly opposed. george h.w. bush, republican, made it illegal to import assault weapons. there was a time in modern history where you could be a national political figure, a national republican, and be in favor of gun control.
know, not have everybody coalesce behind santorum. so it was really last night. had nothing 0 much to do about romn romney. it was all about was this going to be a two-man race. that is increasingly what it looks like. professor dyson, more than three-quarts of the voters in mississippi and alabama were evangelical christians, 80% and 83% this they showed no love for mitt. perhaps more alarmingly, they do appear to be coalescing around santorum. does that make rick a real threat in this race do you think or do you take romney s view and his camp s view that they still are likely to be the nominee? well, to borrow william sapphire s phrase supplied to spiro agnew, he s a nattering naibob of neg taism and negativity to be sure. i think he s a substantial threat not only because the south doesn t give any indication that will support