Commercial industrial, when they go through major renovation or any new construction of commercial industry and broke it down, restaurants, medical offices, et cetera. That is what we did, but requirements we kept the same at this point. So the same table, same requirements. They have been doing that since, i guess, those requirements were in place in the late 1990s or early 2000. So we havent made any changes and that is why i did not address that. Thank you, commissioner moore. I am very interested and very supportive of this particular legislation. What i would like to ask and perhaps you are already doing it, i see diagrams of bike racks, which reflect more of the traditional approach to bike racks and a significant amount of theft, which is happening. I hope sfmta and yourself and the Bicycle Coalition will strongly investigate which types of bike racks and which types of locks provide the largest security . I just recently read an article where the Police Department themselves tr
7500squarefeet of restaurant, there will be class 1 bicycle parking. If its less than 7500, then class 1 wont be required. But class 2 will be in the public rightofway, so they dont have to use their own space for that. The same with other uses. If the space that is provided does not reach of the minimum amount ofsquarefootage that will trigger bicycle parking, they wont have to provide class 1. And existing facilities would not have to comply with this . Existing facilities do not have to do that unless they are doing any update. The 20 increase . Yes. And finally, you didnt talk too much about the lockers and showers, but i assume a fairly Large Company would provide that. What is the trigger for that, because that is an expensive proposition . We didnt change the requirement for showers and lockers, but aligned the use times with the rest of the code. Like it was defined commercial industrial, when they go through major renovation or any new construction of commercial industry and b
Renovation or any new construction of commercial industry and broke it down, restaurants, medical offices, et cetera. That is what we did, but requirements we kept the same at this point. So the same table, same requirements. They have been doing that since, i guess, those requirements were in place in the late 1990s or early 2000. So we havent made any changes and that is why i did not address that. Thank you, commissioner moore. I am very interested and very supportive of this particular legislation. What i would like to ask and perhaps you are already doing it, i see diagrams of bike racks, which reflect more of the traditional approach to bike racks and a significant amount of theft, which is happening. I hope sfmta and yourself and the Bicycle Coalition will strongly investigate which types of bike racks and which types of locks provide the largest security . I just recently read an article where the Police Department themselves tried to recommend to bicyclists what to do. Its a q
Any additional Public Comment on this item . Seeing none, commissioner antonini . I have a few questions on some of the items. You mentioned an increase of 20 insquarefootage or one more additional dwelling units that would trigger the requirement, would that be for a private residence too . If you just added 20 to your residence . So any building . But it could be a private residence or a private home . Yes. Okay. I dont quite understand that. Maybe if you could describe the parking requirements for a small residential building, its just garage space that is sufficient. That is all. For buildings of four units or less, sorry, for buildings less than four units, there wont need to be any rocks. It just needs to be sufficient space for bikes in their garage or any other storage space. For buildings of four or more units there are requirements for one bicycle space for each unit. And then any building that adds another unit or adds 20 ofsquarefootage to the building will be subject to th