people around the trump orbit for a long time have always thought that a racketeering investigation might be the only way to capture all of the bad/criminal conduct that happens under the umbrella of trump. what do you think of that reporting? whether it was ultimately abandoned. obviously, we haven t seen that. what do you make of that approach to investigating all of trump s enterprises? yeah, so first, proving any kind of a white collar case requires willful intent, which can be very difficult to do. it s why people that these crime organizations and white collar criminal organizations sometimes get away with crimes because proving that intent can be so difficult. it s not impossible. jurors are instructed to look at the totality of the circumstances, including all of the facts and all of the things people said. when it comes to racketeering, that is a great tool when you want to bring under one umbrella a lot of different criminal
regarding china and ukraine and other touch stone pieces of national security issues. monog but to your point and your monologue, there s just a lot of unknown questions thatilling the white house doesn t seem t to be willing to answer right now. i want your take on thi they don t want to get your take on this because msnbc s mika brzezinskmsnbi hass interesting theory about what this week s developments mean. take a listen. the key issue of willful intent. to obstruct, that s what it s thing to come down to this week s developments actually make it more likely the doj moves on trump becausesh of the political space that has been given by the penn biden bir center and the garage where joe biden parked his corvette.te so is this about obstruction or is this about the possession of classified documentsifieds and unauthorized to have them that i mean, i didn t seend the video, but it sounds like aa oncewas spinning around as fast as she could try to explain this away. it s you know,
u.s. attorney and legal analyst barbara mcquade. when a. g. merrick garland came out yesterday and spoke about these documents, he said they shouldn t be out there. these are not documents that should be out there. is it though, they were mishandled, he said. is it though, is that criminal in itself? to say classified documents were mishandled. is that enough to say we got to launch criminal investigation. mishandling classified documents are not criminal, it has to be an intent, willful intent, you knew what you were doing and knew it was illegal. there is one statute that makes it a crime to act with gross legs, that is, i had them with me, and i lost them, i left them somewhere and forgot and lost track of them. that could be but the federal government has never prosecuted anyone in the absence of negligence, with obstruction of justice, so technically, you could have a violation without
trump is on notice he is holding these things illegally and not scoring them properly. willful intent goes a long way toward that proof. the other is in the notice of the filing itself. not the affidavit but the notice. it talks about the need to protect certain categories of information and one of those is civilian witnesses, as you ve been discussing. it says a broad range of civilian witnesses. that says to me and you just asked about whether you should assume whether this is someone in trump s orbit. i think it has to be. who else would be a civilian witness with access to this information? perhaps people who work at mar-a-lago. it could be former government officials like pat cipollone, who used to work in the white house council s office but that i thought was really intriguing. and then, you know, the other thing i thought was sort of interesting is it includes donald trump s handwritten notes. what do those notes say? was he writing about the classified documents?
SIMPSONVILLE, S.C. (PRWEB) February 22, 2022 While examining emerging trends in education, Juliette Moon, Ed.D. inquisitively explored a number of cases