that was not true. i represent almost 60,000 public employees and my fellow union leaders appropriate close to 200,000 and we are willing to negotiate, willing to help the state cut costs, and the state gave us a list of ideas and we bargained and we decided the best idea was to create a new retirement tier and the government went along and we signed the deal and he got the new retirement tier in exchange for not letting people off and then immediately later said that is not good enough and demanded more. and we would give or ideas, ways to reduce wasteful will spending and ways to cut overtime and he kept saying that was not good enough and we think it was. we would give him hundreds of millions worth of ideas more than the cot of the employees and he should have been able to take us up on the ideas. but, it is much easier to get rid of the position than it is to actually do some work to try
compromise. preposterous proposition. and david, this is how you drag the company down. look at europe. not much in reducing will spending. it is like expecting drackula to seize fire. they re the worst words in the english upon language. be careful when we talk about who there is a tax increase on. it is on the highest levels of income . by the way. i know this is not going to solve our problem. but you have to give a little to get a little. if you are looking for cuts across the board, you have to be willing to give a little. emac how do they work in the past? last time we saw a great compromise was the move in the