i think it was designed to put pressure on mueller to wrap it up. because he can t possibly really know that or understand sort of the scope of this investigation at this point. glen? and one of the most vivid signs of things to come is contained in this 24 page indictment of roger stone. when it talks about coordination with respect to the future wikileaks drop by senior trump campaign officials. indeed, it says that somebody in the campaign directed a senior campaign trump official to keep coordinating with roger stone about future sort of weaponized e-mail releases. who in the world can direct a senior trump campaign official to do something? not somebody junior. unless it s don jr., right? it has to be somebody more senior. we don t know who it is yet but we re going to find out. again, none of this
no. no, there s a lot of dots that are being connected now, thomas, including so donald trump here s the time line, right. paul pan afort takes over, who has deep connections to russia and to pro-russia regime in ukraine. he takes over and about a month later is when donald trump publicly calls on the russians to hack hillary clinton. i want s also right around the same time that the gop platform is being changed at the convention to be more pro russia. it s also about the same time the ambassador and some other trump associates are meeting with the russians. and then we don t hear from trump. he stops doing news conferences. and it is during that time that russia actually goes ahead and hacks hillary clinton and puts out all this information in a very strategic way, because i remember i was in a green room when the first wikileaks drop came, and you know when it came? hours after the donald trump access hollywood tape came out. so that was very strategic to try and deflect att
agreement as mr. clinton said in ta debate back in iowa. and lori, is think any evidence that the trade-off to get cheaper tchotchkes for people like you and me is in some way a net benefit for all the lost jobs and everything else? you can actually now do the numbers, and theoretically trade helps us on the import side by providing less expensive goods, but the loss we suffer because these kinds of trade agreements offshore, huge numbers, of different kinds of jobs now nets out negative. even when you save on some, that is to say, on some goods, the loss in u.s. income means on average the median $7,000 per person a year. i want to talk about two of these agreements that i learned these in the podcast i did with you, lori, that stunned me. this first on panama. this is from the wikileaks drop, a state department secret memo
person a year. i want to talk about two of these agreements that i learned these in the podcast i did with you, lori, that stunned me. this first on panama. this is from the wikileaks drop, a state department secret memo to panama in 2006. this is from our state department to panama in 2006. it guess as follows it says, this american government, the pan manic incorporation regime ensures secrecy, avoids taxes and shields eight from the enforcement of legal judgments. oh, isn t that fun ji can t believe it. along with its sophisticated banking services panama remains an environment conducive to launder the proceeds from criminal activity and creates a vulnerability to terrorist financing. why would we want to do a free trade agreement with these people? because the big u.s. banks want us to do it. why do we want this agreement
wikileaks drop. that is right and it looks like it will come either late today or tomorrow moring supposedly 250,000 state department classified documents supposedly some embarrassing revealations about u.s. officials assessment of karzai the president of afghanistan, of some of the russian officials, perhaps some stuff that you wouldn t want to get out about negotiations with the russians on arms control could have an impact on the new start treaty,. the two senators both, you know, as everybody does says that they would love to find a way to put wikileaks out of business but seems beyond our reach. in terms of start whether it is that or just the facts of start and particularly the fact that there seems to be a disagreement between the russians and the u.s. about a linkage between arms control and missile defense senator graham says he doesn t think there is any possibility that they will pass ratify the start