then you can do anything about that. it s okay to call someone a particular name as long as you feel like they are acting like that. tucker: [laughs] pour don lemon. nice guy. that sure was unbelievable. christopher harris was on it. he is the executive director of on hyphenated america and he joins us tonight. i watched that clip and first i felt so bad for you. but i was also it was an amazing moment where you had someone defending the use of racial slurs because they are politically expedient. what happened, tucker, is that the left showed who they really are. ofof course, she calls herself a conservative, republican, but, yeah, c what she wants to say hebut at the end of the day, wih the left does, they tried to put everybody in a box. what we believe is america s best when it s on hyphenated. if you believe in it, you believe that you embrace thei
in trump administration including ambassador haley, who have beeng tough on russia. what do you make. one thing about those diplomats, sounds like they can alternate in. bologna may have been phony in sense that russia will be able to replace those individuals with. different spies. a whole fresh batch. the president is in a pickle, he does not want to be as we have seen with north korea, chinae with other autocrats, president believes he can charm them or have s good relationship with these people, even when his their governments are at laggerheads, we re watching what islu unfolding wih china. this could be bad, this is getting serious quickly with china. if you raise hogs or grow corn this could be a dangerous moment. but president wants to keep a
there is no reason to continue to sell to people a weapon of war like this. sean:le let me be clear.o allowing the federal government to place limits on our right tos self-defense from threats foreign and domestic is not going to result in a safer society. moreover, it does nothing to increase school security, it does nothing to protect our kids from deranged criminals who do not care about the law. i have no doubt the democrats, pro-government, antigun arguments were well-intentioned. i don t question their intentions., i assume they want americans to be safe. but i have a warning. the road to hell waswi paved wih good intentions. here now, someone calling on the broward county sheriff s office to release the footage of their response during the stoneman douglas shooting, a host of michelle malkin investigates, michelle malkin. we saw 9/11, cops going up, whea they knew what could potentially
i think this active measureses effort by the russians could have tilted the election in donald trump s favor.rt tucker: [laughs] keep telling russians turned out to be not very good campaign operatives and were terrible at targeting swing states. according to robert mueller s indictment, they didn t even know what a purple state was until 2016. just a few hundred bucks were spent on key states like michigan and pennsylvania. thousands are wasted in states like california and maryland, obviously were going democrat from day one and did. an attorney a renowned campaign finance expert who has been on a long time joins us in the studio.in if you were attempting to defeat donald trump, or rather hillary clinton in favor of trump, would you have w done wih the russians did? i would ve spent a lot more than $46,000 or whatever number it is. the senate intelligence committee heard testimonies from facebook that they can only account for $46,000 total.
experienced, birilliant crew wih him. the most important thing i think that assuming this questioning takes place, either informally or at the grand jury, let s say it happens informally, most important thing is to not have time constraint on it. to make it clear there s not going be a time limitation on the questioning. that s number one. number two, is to serve notice on the president that he s going to answer every question unless he claims a privilege. he will not be allowed to do what president clinton did and say, there s certain things i m not going to answer, even though i m not i am not invoking the privilege. and the message needs to be loud and clear that thif you refuse answer a question and don t invoke a privilege, you re going to get a subpoena and you re going to go down to the grand jury. sol, i hate to sound cynical, let s pretend i m not talking about the president. wouldn t it be a dandy strategy for the principal to say, yeah, i m very anxious to talk to them,