good explanation for the president about what he meant for ulterior motives? no. and he realizes reverend sharpton, that the president comes with potentially $3.7 billion. that, by the way, the local communities need. they are the ones complaining how do we in fact handle all of this? how can we pay for this and that s what president is saying. here, i have a check. i m willing to right this check. if the congress will pass it and this will help you out. and let me draw something else that i find very hypocritical, to too. everyone is criticizing the president, why hasn t he flown from washington to the border. excuse me, why hasn t the governor flown from his state? he hasn t even been to the you re not suggesting that the governor has an ulterior motive for criticizing the president? i m not usually into conspiracy theories.
stand up and say something? one would hope at a certain point the players would. we were talking about the difference between i know the nfl and the nba are different. you have a new commissioner in the nba, he made a very quick statement. we had you hear talking about donald sterling, very quick and decisive, but perfectly tuned reaction to the donald sterling reaction. very strong stand, and yet here i don t feel roger kadel weak as a commissioner, why hasn t he made more of a statement? he sort of dodge the question. he was asked directly, would you call a native american a red skin to his or her face? the argument to keep the nation is tradition. that s basically the only argument. 1933. but so what, so many things have occurred we have evolved. exactly. why should tradition be a reason to keep something up that according to the court decision offends 30%, at least 30% of the
beat, did he go, why hasn t he been fired yet? did they leave president obama with no choice than to push him out. i don t know if it was president obama. shinseki, a good man, didn t want to be a distraction, which is what the president said. give me awe minute. it s the official line. it is the official line but this is the doddler in chief here. take a look at sebelius, hhs secretary, how long did it take him to finally lop her head off? it seems to me the press was writing stories about obama s failure to show leadership in this scandal. there s a bit of difference in that obamacare was scene as a partisan scandal. this affects every single person. jona, i understand the need for the president to show leadership action by doing something, making the change. a cool change of pace. why did the media focus so obsessively on this one personnel move? i have to say, it was strange to me.
indicating he has more information. why didn t he release this in the past? why is he holding out for more? if he has such great stuff, why hasn t he already been granted immunity from prosecution? it would seem that the governor would step back out and reiterate his position on this. if evidence exists, there s no gray area here. your thoughts. why he wouldn t have come out sooner, he made it clear, or his lawyer made it clear when his lawyer said he would have much more to say if you were to give immunity. there are a lot of potential sources of information out there for the u.s. attorney s office. there are a lot of potential people out there who could be valuable to the u.s. attorney s office whether it is david
that are due. what is happening here is that congress is in danger of weakening the very institution of congress set up by article one that gives congress the power to tax, to borrow. if it fails to act, it is open the door for president obama to essentially breach this article one power by relying on his constitutional power under article two which says he has to take care of the laws to be faithfully executed. we are looking a constitutional crisis, showdown, and this is a card president obama could surely play. martha: why hasn t he, do you think? i will just go ahead, he has said before when needed he would take action. first of i don t think the president wants to come don t