justice asks the tough questions. who deserves the benefit of the doubt. is the 20-year-old driving with an air freshener on his rearview mirror who you discover has a warrant or the more than 26 year police veteran with extensive training who kills him when she mistakes a firearm for a taser. who exploited him, is it the teenager allegedlied coerced into performing sexual acts with a millionaire, or a woman who says she is being scapegoated for the actions of a man who committed suicide awaiting his own trial? i wonder, who do you see when you look at elizabeth holmes? an impressionable woman manipulated by an abusive lover into believing her technology actually worked? or a technical savant who duped a who s who list of gullible investors.
into performing sexual acts with a millionaire, or a woman who says she is being scapegoated for the actions of a man who committed suicide awaiting his own trial? i wonder, who do you see when you look at elizabeth holmes? an impressionable woman manipulated by an abusive lover into believing her technology actually worked? or a technical savant who duped a who s who list of gullible investors. and just who do you consider a victim? someone who doesn t want to be held accountable for their mistakes or the person who has had to pay dearly for that mis mistake, sometimes with their own life. i woender who deserves your sympathy, the person who cries on the stand or the person for whom so many tears have been shed? and as for second chances, well, second chances are a luxury of