justice asks the tough questions. who deserves the benefit of the doubt. is the 20-year-old driving with an air freshener on his rearview mirror who you discover has a warrant or the more than 26 year police veteran with extensive training who kills him when she mistakes a firearm for a taser. who exploited him, is it the teenager allegedlied coerced into performing sexual acts with a millionaire, or a woman who says she is being scapegoated for the actions of a man who committed suicide awaiting his own trial? i wonder, who do you see when you look at elizabeth holmes? an impressionable woman manipulated by an abusive lover into believing her technology actually worked? or a technical savant who duped a who's who list of gullible investors.