but then, at the same time, is there is idea, mercedes, of subtly sending a signal to the jury, remember who s on trial here? john, i am still befuddled by any criticism of the concerned parent who is going to the trial of their child s. it doesn t matter if it s a step child, this is her child. she helped raise him. he may be facing 25 years in prison if he s convicted of all three charges. it is absolutely reasonable for her to be there. frankly, if she wasn t there, i m sure the criticism would be the opposite, that he s callous and she doesn t care and she s putting the objects over the care and love she has for her child. it s absolutely reasonable for her to be there. john: mark, click final thought. i agree with her, but to your point, there s a subtle message. she s not just an average mother. that said, no criticism. she is a mother, and anyone else who wouldn t be out there supporting their loved ones, they are being intellectual he
and to of been tested on, used as research subjects in a place where they should ve felt safe and cared for and looked after it is staggering for that it mystifies all words and believe. d0 staggering for that it mystifies all words and believe. staggering for that it mystifies all words and believe. do you know what the answer to words and believe. do you know what the answer to the words and believe. do you know what the answer to the obvious question i the answer to the obvious question of, how it could ve been done consent from the families, what is the answer to that? i consent from the families, what is the answer to that? the answer to that? i don t know. obviously the the answer to that? i don t know. obviously the doctors the answer to that? i don t know. obviously the doctors are - the answer to that? i don t know. obviously the doctors are not - the answer to that? i don t know. | obviously the doctors are not here they can t provide us with their answers i dare sa
supported with humanitarian assistance if they are out of harm s way. but second, even if people are largely out of harm s way, inevitably there is going to remain a pretty significant civilian population in rafah, and we believe that a major military operation with a large presence of a civilian population would have terrible consequences for that population. in a moment i will speak live to wyre davies injerusalem and sivaoush ardalan of the bbc persian in the newsroom but first nomia iqbal in washington. what is the administration saying about what happened overnight? they are being very tight lipped at the moment. the most we ve heard is there from america s top diplomat antony blinken, who wouldn t be drawn into too much detail. i pretty much expect that s what president biden will emphasise if he does
so, in other words, because this argument is getting more with each passing day to say would be less satisfying to the american public to see it done this way. as opposed to seeing donald trump defeated on the ballot. that would be the same as saying, it s okay to let somebody run for president who wouldn t be 35 at the time of their inauguration. or hasn t been the country for certain maritime. or is a naturalized citizen. these are qualifications. they re not penalties. that s exactly right, ali. what the american public is going to come to understand is that the constitution of the united states is what will forbid the former president from running. from holding the office of the presidency again. if that s the decision of the supreme court of the united