fringes, i want to show you exactly what the jury did find trump liable today. so you can see it for yourself. here is the jury s verdict form. question one, did miss carol proof by preponderance of the evidence that mr. trump raped miss carroll? answer, no. question two, did miss carol proof by a proponents of evidence that mr. trump sexually abused miss carroll? answer, yes. was miss carroll injured as a result of mr. trump s conduct? yes. if yes, insert $1 amount that would fairly and adequately compensate her for that injury. and you could see there the jury has written in $2 million. what s mr. trump s conduct willfully or wonderfully negligent? yes. how much if any should mr. trump a miss carroll and punitive damages? $20,000. that is the first part about the sexual abuse. then there is this half about the defamation about trump denying carols claims, and trying to publicly trash her reputation. quote, did miss carroll prove by a preponderance of the
be and can be taking in more ukrainians in need? honestly it would be out of my unicef mandate for me to comment on how many people go where. i certainly know, being here, exactly 365,000 days ago. there wasn t a person i spoke to, not a single mom, who didn t want to come home. who hoped this would be short term. on one hand, as you said at the start of your show, this is a nation of fathers here, who have not hugged their children or seen their wives for a year. we also know, historically, over decades, when people do go to another country, the migration adds a normally, they re bringing their culture, they add to a workforce, this is not opinion, this is research. whatever a country can absorb for people who have learned so much, but would much rather be here with their loved ones, with her husband, with their grandparents of their children. then yes, these people at a normal amounts.
she came to the same conclusion as i did. there were mps, there are mps in your party who talked about revenge, who talked about payback time. ijust wondered, many people think some people think that it was actually the moment when channel 4 news replaced borisjohnson, who didn t want to appear on their show with an ice sculpture. that was the moment that sunk it for channel 4. i think fundamentally what fuelled this agenda in the first place was around sustainability and looking after the taxpayers interests. and that s certainly been at the heart of the work that i ve conducted, making sure that the taxpayer s asset, channel 4, is protected, is given an opportunity to flourish, that the jobs and people s communities and independent sector are not threatened, that we continue to expand them, that we support our creative sector. that s why, as part of this package, i m delighted that we ve managed to get channel 4 to agree to double their investment in skills to £10 million, which is
new under borisjohnson. this issue has been a long term issue in terms of we ve seen many, many predecessors look at this, karen bradley, for instance, looked at it. she came to the same conclusion as i did. there were mps, there are mps in your party who talked about revenge, who talked about payback time. ijust wondered, many people think some people think that it was actually the moment when channel 4 news replaced borisjohnson, who didn t want to appear on their show with an ice sculpture. that was the moment that sunk it for channel 4. i think fundamentally what fuelled this agenda in the first place was around sustainability and looking after the taxpayers interests. and that s certainly been at the heart of the work that i ve conducted, making sure that the taxpayer s asset, channelli, is protected, is given an opportunity to flourish, that the jobs and people s communities and independent sector are not threatened, that we continue to expand them, that we support our creative
ijust wondered, many people think some people think that it was actually the moment when channel 4 news replaced borisjohnson, who didn t want to appear on their show with an ice sculpture. that was the moment that sunk it for channel 4. i think fundamentally what fuelled this agenda in the first place was around sustainability and looking after the taxpayers interests. and that s certainly been at the heart of the work that i ve conducted, making sure that the taxpayer s asset, channelli, is protected, is given an opportunity to flourish, that the jobs and people s communities and independent sector are not threatened, that we continue to expand them, that we support our creative sector. that s why, as part of this package, i m delighted that we ve managed to get channel 4 to agree to double their investment in skills to £10 million, which is, you know, it s a substantial sum that will be helping the wider creative sector and young people, and that they will be doubling the number o