that is all that i know. i assume the police already know a good bit more than that. i m connie and i are on the way to dayton soon after this interview is completed. we ve left our home in cleveland this morning and heading south and going to dayton and will be there sometime this afternoon. is there any reason to believe that there is any connection whatsoever between what happened in el paso and what happened in dayton, a copy cat or a similar white supremacist ideology in is there any indication as of now? i have no way of knowing that. i just would ask i would just hope the president would would begin to try to would stop the divisive racist rhetoric that he has employed increasingly. he did it in the campaign in 16. many thought that would be enough to keep him from winning but more importantly he does it even more now and i just remember what barack obama did
trump has campaigned on white supremacist ideology, on division and fear. and now we see that he was able to normalize islamophobia and to give legitimacy to those who fear muslims and fear immigrants. so it comes back to him and we tell him that your words matter and your policies matter. if he would like to be the leader of the free world, he has to change his policies. and he has to reset the tone by recommitting himself to unity, equality, not only in words, but also in policies. so he has a lot to do and we hope that he will take the first step by condemning this as a white supremacist attack. secretary castro, when the president of the united states is spoken about that way by an american muslim leader in the wake of the attack like what happened in new zealand, how does the united states get back
slaves. this was an institutionalized and condoned action by the government from 1619 to 1865, de facto acts have shown the impact of slavery on african-americans. so the bill is not a check. the bill is as those thoughtful democratic presidential candidates have said they have indicated we have suffered because of racism, we know that the acts of racial white supremacist bias or acts of increased by 182% by the anti-defamation league, 58% of the incidents of bias were racial ethnicity and white supremacists in 2017, so we re asking for the bill establishes a legitimate commission appointed by the president to speak of the house, the leader
give legitimacy to those who fear muslims and fear immigrants. it comes back to him and we tell him that your words matter and your policies matter. and he would like to be the leader of the free world. he has to change his policies. and he has to reset the tone by recommitting himself to unity, equality, not only in words but also in policies. so he has a lot to do and we hope that he will take the first step by condemning this as a white supremacist attack. when the president of the united states is spoken of that way in the wake of an attack like what happened in new zealand, how do we get back our moral authority to be able to respond in a profound way when something like what happened in new zealand takes place?
islam extremists. the refusal to condemn white supremacy have undermined america s moral authority when events like what hand in new zealand take place. one question for each will be how and if a new president can get that authority back. joining me now is one of the candidates, former secretary of housing and urban development under poemp. president obama. thank you for being here. great to be with you, joy. i want to play with for you what the director of care on the american islamic relations. said the following about donald trump. take a listen. it is no secret that mr. trump has campaigned on white supremacist ideology, on division and fear. and now we see that he was able to normalize islamaphobia and to