case to allow cameras in the courtroom for the arraignment. lawyers for soon to be the independent donald trump argue against having cameras, they r claiming it would create a circus like atmosphere, and we know how much he hits that tonight, since we ve been on the air, the judge has jus issued a ruling in this case i will tell you exactly what the ruling says. i m just reviewing it at m desk right now five photographers should be allowed to in the jury box par to the commencement of the raymond. the photographers will b permitted to take still photos for several minutes unti they re directed to vacate the jury box by court personnel. no for the photography will be permitted in the courtroom after that use of the cameras will be permitted in the hallways of the building again, cameras will be allowed in the hallways but not in the courtroom itself once things get underway the judge also says reporter will be able to bring sulfones and laptops inside the court but they can
hold them accountable throug the legislative process, eithe through law or budgets, of course power is going to accumulate there we love to look at th appropriations process and limited funds going to some of these agencies we have to defund and mak cuts in the department o justice. we either get thi government back on our side or we find and get rid of, an abolish, the fbi and cdc and anti-half. doj, every last one of them. you heard that correctly. republicans have apparentl come full circle it turns out that after al their fearmongering, they ar the ones who want to defund la enforcement. remember, the job of the justice department is not just to file abstract legal decrees it is to keep our country safe that phrase is literally i their mission statement. they also oversee the fbi, which handles domestic and international terrorism, organized crime, white colla
the tax one seems mor straightforward. let me just ask one more question, is this presenting a legal theory like this to move misdemeanors up to a felony, i that something you ve done i your time? oh, many times. if this doesn t strike yo as some crazy thing they pul that i had for trump no, as i said, i use th term mundane, this is monday a run of the mill, white colla case except for who the defendant s there is another case, my wife kate do pulling this to m attention. i did not realize the ee carroll lawsuit, again, this i not defamation, that s a new york law, that allows survivor of sexual assault, passed th statutes of limitations fo supercell damages. she has a lawsuit, she s got a defamation suit, because she said your lawyer that s hung up in a weir procedural thing, in which the d.c. court of appeals has to rule whether the president defaming her was in hi professional capacity. this case is going to go t
paul manafort in the state case, where the state brought charge after paul manafort, was pardoned that, pardon only works at the federal level, to see if there could be stat charges. any was successful in arguin that it would violate the stat double jeopardy rules. so you can understand why he i being added. i have to say that the mai lawyer, susan nicholas, who wa a very key player in the trump organization trials, is a very experienced and very wel respected defense lawyer between those two, you actuall have a very good team. it is not the usual suspects that we have seen in other circumstances. and i know that they both have very good reputations with the da s office and a good working relationship, which is the way it should be and very often is. in the so-called white colla