The motion would come back before lawmakers at their next meeting on July 21.
Lamont admitted that he voted in favour of the measure when it came forward in April, but added that it was presented mostly as a way to generate revenue to offset the projected property tax increase.
I saw that there was a need to find some revenue sources here, and I voted for it, but now I m willing to say let s revisit it, Lamont said.
It wasn t done as well as it could have been, not up to the Whistler standard. It was brought forward as kind of an omnibus bill, and as a councillor, I don t think we really got a chance to debate it. I d like to see bylaw come to us with a full presentation.