the democratic party, ic specifically friends, said the fbe. cials ani leaders would often ue heavy armed swat teams to show a use of force to arrest said th supporters of donald trump purely ford often political re. and steve friend would know because he was on the fbi swata. team. inthat s true, it s illegal a deal. is it in a doj that cared abouti equal justice? ital. would trigger an immediate investigation. but when steve friend filed his complaint, the doj did not give him any whistleblower protections which are required by federal law. instead, the dojy whistl retalid against a friend. they escorted him out of the daytona beach field office. they put him on unpaid leave and pressured him to resign. he left the agency the day he testified publicly about all of this. he s a brave guy.st nofr one iiend.n the democratict hatheys said a word about whatu happened to steve friend. they do not care. they wan a bravee democrt to bu. we d o not.it s n and it s not hard to see wh
testimony to congress by a senior political appointee. regarding the investigation into hunter biden. in dveo you think it s worth looking into the possibility of indue influence here? look, anyone who comeses forward and seeks whistleblower protections status should be given that status. that s part of what we ve put in place over many years. so a little bug in the corner. it had cbs. cbs is covering the story. let s go back to the quote. he says, anyone who comes forward and seeks whistleblower protection status should be given that status. so the irs whistleblowers should get protection suddenly . that according to chris, who , by the way, replace joe biden in delaware. but the fbi whistleblower gets suspended without pay and ultimately he s forced to resign. what could explain tha st? here s a thought. it makes sense i becausef democs view the fbi whistleblower as ac threat to their ability to punish their political opponents. oo joe bid the fbi using federal law enfor they wa