they aren t the only ones speaking out. multiple whistleblowers are stepping forward in multiple investigations. hard to keep it straight but that s why david spunt is here to sort it out for us. a lot of whistleblowers, no question about it. the f.b.i. is out with a new statement following that testimony yesterday. pretty succinct. the f.b.i. s mission is to uphold the constitution and protect the american people. the f.b.i. has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures. these men insist they are protected whistleblowers and were punished for questioning january 6th investigations. the f.b.i. in a letter to congress explains why two had security clearances revoked. two men questioned what happened on january 6th. one used an unauthorized flash drive to remove files from an f.b.i. computer and an attorney
employment. on one hand we want to try to get our jobs back because we are trying to do our patriotic duty but, on the other hand, we still have families to take care of. it s essentially a death sentence in the modern era. in an accusation of retaliation, the fbi responded stating the fbi s mission to uphold the constitution and protect the american people, the fbi has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures. and house democrats feel that it s the intelligence community that s come under attack and that this hearing was just an excuse to hurl accusations. this, of course, led to fiery exchanges including one where congressman jim jordan was accused of withholding one of the whistleblower s prior testimony. watch. i m not aware that you are able to withhold information from the minority that we would need to use. not fair. when it comes to whistleblowers you are not. these are not. i would remind everyone when it comes to wh
government will crush you and your family. the fbi has not and will not retaliate against whistleblower disclosures. fireworks flew throughout as jim jordan was accused of withholding a whistleblower prior testimony. i m not aware you are able to withhold information from the minority we would need to use to prepare when it comes to whistleblower, we are not. i would remind the gentlemen from new york with the information we had. when you were part of the investigation with anonymous whistleblower. that just one of many tense
is protected whistleblower activity under the law. this applies regardless of whether the whistleblower produces evidence at that time backing up their allegations. only protecting whistleblower disclosures accompanied by conclusive efforts as the democrats seem to require would have disastrous consequences throughout the government. whistleblowers brought allegations and when the committees thought it worthy of follow up. no one expects a private citizen to investigate a crime before going to police. we didn t expect a whistleblower to look at their own agency. the law for recommend he deeing retalltation where working a monday proverb laos allegation leads to discovery, interviews and more. simply put, the burden isn t on the whistleblower. that s why there is an investigative process. democrats report got the facts wrong. they claim d.o.j. i.g. declined
public and apparently the irs has said, you know what? let s put some other people on that team. brian: so the whistleblower came forward and said there s a huge problem. we had this hunter biden situation and this politics in it. we should have been able to move forward with this case and i basically have been told not to. he couldn t sleep at night. he will spoke up and said i m going to be a whistleblower. the right thing to do. doesn t matter my politics is to pursue and investigate equally. instead of dealing with the whistleblower. they ended the they stopped, they just put cease and desist with the whole division. ainsley: they sent a letter. the attorneys sent a letter. the attorneys that represent the whistleblower to congress. today the internal revenue service special agent we represent was informed that he and his entire investigative team are being removed from the ongoing and sensitive investigation of the high profile controversial subject about which our client so