how it means anything. all she did is i think andy mccarthy was the first person to point out several hours ago, all she did is stand up and say these five different committees which are investigating things they don t like about the administration were out calling them part of an impeachment inquiry. it s not like watergate where there was actually a vote to authorize an investigation based on the saturday night so will know i think it is completely for show. allen, new details tonight from ed henry about the whistle-blower. senior administration officials are telling fox that apparently, the whistle-blower did have some political bias. in favor of a rival candidate of president trump and the official doesn t have the name of the rival candidate and the whistle-blower supports biden or another specific candidate, but look for the administration to highlight that. each site is going to put out they are facts that are helpful
fine with that. and i just heard the president s personal, political attorney say that he was directed by the state department to go meet with ukraine to geted evidence on the president s political opponent. now remember they controlledd congress for much of the obama administration, for the first two years of the trump administration and investigated hillary and clinton, obama all the time, yet rudy giuliani who hasn t practiced law since the early 80s says he has evidence come all this information. he s making things up and if the biden s were not public figures commit would be lifeless. i m sure my friend the former u.s. attorney would agree with that. laura: first of all, rudy is listening and he will respond to what you said.d. good. laura: we will let you go on but first the trump administration did say, by the way, the witness, the whistle-blower testified to. they have no problem with it. so that will all happen.
but i don t know why, frankly, anybody cares much about the whistle-blower anymore. i know the democrats want the whistle-blower on. as someone who used to try cases, once you have the evidence that the whistle-blower is blowing the whistle about, the whistle-blower becomes irrelevant. so if it turns out that the whistle-blower s problem was the e-change or the communication between president trump and president zelensky and a belief there was a quid pro quo, tomorrow we are going to have this transcript that is reported. once the transcript is public laura what is the difference between you and me and the whistle-blower? what is the difference? we will all have heard the ertranscript and be able to make up our own minds about it. laura: it is interesting to know who is getting second and third-hand information on calls the president having with foreign leaders. i find that that is a separate matter. that is a different problem.
it is really shocking to me that these people couldn t even wait one day to read the transcript and can t wait. apparently, we get the full list of a whistle-blower report in a week or so. it s just shocking to me that you would try to start the stampede without actually looking at the materials. i find that very troubling. and i also want to say that i find it also troubling when someone mentioned earlier, i mean, how does a whistle-blower even know about this? how do people even know about this conversation, what kind of leaking is going on? i think that is very concerning. but my main point go ahead sorry. you also have to look at the constitution. the frame has debated this. some of the framer said abusive should be enough for impeachment. they had a vote on it. the frame of the constitution said, no, that would give congress too much power.
all she did is, i think andy mccarthy was the first person to point out today severall hours ago, all she did is stand up and say these five different committees which are investigating things they don t like about the administration tre out calling them part of an impeachment inquiry. it s not like it was in watergate where there was actually a vote to authorize an investigation based on the saturday night so, no, i think it is completely for show. alan, new details tonight from ed henry about the whistle-blower. senior administration officials are telling fox that apparently the whistle-blower did have some political bias in favor of a rival candidate of president trump. the official doesn t have the name of the rival candidate and the whistle-blower supports biden or another specific candidate, but look for the administration to highlight that. each site is going to put out helpful facts that are to them, that s how these cycles