article two and that the president has violated his oath of office and there s clear evidence that he has done so. but we know as democrats this is a somber and important position and road that we have to take. and so we are very carefully investigating, and the whistle blowers are an institution that is statutorily protected by the laws of this land. they come forward because they believe they have information. no whistle-blower has been found to come forward falsely to my knowledge or to come forward without serious thought. this second whistle-blower, the indication is that he or she has first-hand knowledge merchandise but the first whistle-blower had a detailed complaint with many, many citations of other individuals who had affirmed what this person, he or she, ultimately wrote. how much more do republicans have to have before they take what is before us very
nothing is everything ask your dermatologist about skyrizi. welcome back. we ve been following the news of a second whistle-blower coming forward in trump s ukraine saga. and i want to bring in 2020 presidential candidate. senator, thanks for being with us. thanks for having me. first, your reaction to this news of a second whistle-blower. i don t find it surprising. i think there are a lot of people that witnessed this kind of behavior and we re only at the beginning of knowing the depth and the breadth of it. remember this is now an allegation that it s not only implicated by the president by
what s not true. we ve seen the transcript. we ve heard the president s own words. now we have these texts involving volker, involving sondland, involving others all caught up in this. what more would the house need before they vote on impeachment? they may need nothing more. there is is a there s a lot there. but, you know, there s no point in, you know, treating this as if the investigation is over this time. the most important thing that the whistle-blower, the original whistle-blower said in his complaint other than his description of the phone call, which has since been vindicated is that there are other people in the white house. he said there were six of them who were concerned, who knew about the impropriety of the president s relationship with ukraine. those people need to be identified and interviewed in a
behaved improperly with regard to ukraine. what the whistle-blower has done has given a road map to investigators. he hadn t claimed that he has first-hand knowledge. he has simply said there are these six other people in the white house whom you should talk to. it may be the second whistle-blower is one of those people. it may be this whistle bleer has other information. the point is that there should be an investigation. i don t know what this whistle-blower says, but there should be an investigation of what these people say, the leads they provide and most importantly the whistle-blowers themselves shouldn t be harassed or threatened the way the president has done. what would you be looking at in terms of additional information that needs to be gleaned? well, the whole nature of the relationship between president zelensky of ukraine and the president of the united states particularly the relationship
they want to see take on trump. kyung? reporter: senator kamala harris begins a three-day swing through iowa. she is holding a town hall here on the campus of iowa state university in ames, iowa, and has increasingly begun to sharpen her attack line, her message against donald trump. and iowans at least the ones i ve spoken with say they like what they hear, also what they re seeing from washington democrats. they should go harder and faster. they think there s another whistle-blower and i think they should come out and i think they should attack him as far st as they can. i think they re doing their research. i think they re doing their homework. i think they re speaking out. i think they re taking action and i think they re very serious about this, which makes me