certainly, you have to know a lot more about the juror than we know. it is permitted to be known froh limited or deer that they are doing pure generally come i would say that. is not a juror and i m not sure how a big firm. lawyer will take this kind of time from work. but the bottom line is jesse wegman issue quoted earlier certainly has it wrong. trump s fifth and sixthven amendment rights are clearlychar violated in this case and he doesn t know what is charged with. the target of felony and the judge prove that intervale of motion to dismiss when heur said the government has put forward four different theories and three are okayde.r how dohe you defend at the same time whether he doctored the businessecti records to commit x claim or election crime?t th it is absolutely absurd, but the judge tried to cover full circle. oui think we as lawyers have an obligation to speak out about this for this country and around the world. yoze u so this week maybe this l trust wrote a column in
now, let s look at it another way and i tweeted about thisd.a. earlier today, imagine if some conservativea ha d.a. and i dont know mobile, alabama, had decided to win type biden forta violating sometu corrupt businea statute for al al the shenanigas he and huntehr were involved in in china and so forth, and then the judge in the case was as g.o.p. appointee and the judgest daughter or son was a bigr fu consultant or fund-raiser for trump here then imagined that this judge issued a gag order prohibiting biden from speaking out about what is an obvious conflict or at least apparent conflict of interest. now what with the left there and say, oh, gee this is taking place in good faith and the justice system is working just fine.al certainly the times would not write that, no, they would and complain alabama is a deep redab state that doesn t respect women s rights and also saye biden can t get a fair trial there.
in the case.we we know the doubter has a vested interest in the case and the judge tow make sure the casetro isn t dismissed and now to make sure trump will never leave the courtroom and since there everyday? we know the right to bee prespresentat thnee trial was ad transection 6 under the amendment. these arefene the right of the defendant. th waie court of appeals it cane waived. it is the defendant s right, but he wants to make sure he s outa. there campaigning. that is it. laura: whatever happens,ce don t go out and go to harlem and convince a lot of people that this is a total sham ande that thewoy should vote for youm because you will stand up for the working people. can have them dohtow that, speeh hear it i think what i wast saying in the angle, everyone understands in our country it seems the democrats and liberals have more rights, more leeway, s more freedom and a lot of
until then, if you are a concert, conservative, you dare to stand up for the middle class or donate to someone who is in your stand against the washington swamp, the d.c. machine, the deep state, the doj,cies the federal agencies, e ag os, i and city d.a.s will ignore ethicalg of rules, distot any law or makeup walls to come after you. and that is the angle. joining me now david schoen,r former impeachment attorney and sol wisenberg, former deputy independent counsel , could trump still get a fair trial inyork new york if this judge theret? judge merchan is presiding overc it? i think it will be difficult to get a fair trial in new york respective of whether juan merchan is presiding because of theoverwh overwhelmig hostility that judge by members of thet, jury pool.
loss in 2020. that was it. she showed she was biased andjug there was a language that suggested she might be biased.ot the judge found in this case and this juror could continue. we went david. listen, he agonized over another juror in the case whod i had horrible social media posts and finallusy we decided to exce it for cause because she also wrote that trump should be locked up. he seemed to think that was a close call, but he did strikes her for cause. people are wondering where the jury selection is moving faster than expected. it is because he is not exercising challenge for cause.. he is letting people in who clearly have a bias. listen, this judge has nor business being on the casene. we set under new york 2022c irr, 100.3e1d3. he recused himself and the judge tshall disqualify himself if he has a relative to the sixth degree who has an interest thate could be k substantially effecte