was shortly after he was fired that the president attempted to interfere in the investigation of mike flynn. that don t mean the president did. it means in jim comey s view there is evidence of it. so the memos back up the testimony that he gave. bill: thank you, judge. come on back. of course. sandra: a horrific bombing attack by the taliban has left dozens dead in afghanistan. 57 people were killed with over 100 wounded at a voter registration center. david lee miller live in jerusalem. what more do we know about this latest violence? let s start with the latest violence in afghanistan. at least 18 police and soldiers in afghanistan were killed today alone. in two almost simultaneous attacks. the first one happening in the western part of the country. militants today launched assaults targeting army units
meeting between president trump and kim jong-un. something that pompeo is already doing as cia director. the administration, its diplomacy they want the confirmation out of the senate. bill: a lot of drama surrounding that. thank you, rich. sandra: attorney general jeff sessions threatening to resign if president trump fires deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. that news coming from the washington post . this coming as a dozen republican lawmakers have written a letter to the justice department demanding a criminal investigation into james comey and members of the obama administration over their handling of the clinton email probe. here is republican congressman ron desantis on sunday morning futures. you look at somebody like jim comey. he testified before us in congress that he did not decide to exonerate hillary until after her interview and subsequent efforts of oversight unearthed the memo that he
you aren t allowed just to take them and leak them to the media. bill: in that comment he did not reference the law. he referenced the rules. it is clear that f.b.i. and d.o.j. regulations were violated by the mere delivery of those memoranda even if they didn t contain anything classified to the professor. so the professor friend of comey s. this professor, jonathan turley, is correct there. i think the house intel or judiciary committee is more interested in whether jim comey violated federal law not d.o.j. regs. he doesn t work for the department of justice anymore. they can t do anything to him for the violation of the regulations. bill: did he lie under oath? he may very well have lied under oath. senator grassley knew what he was asking and knew that there
was contrary testimony under oath. so will he be prosecuted for lying or misleading the congress? if it is a clear case of lying or misleading i think he will be. if it s a he said/she said, this case he said/he said, i don t think it will. bill: you read the comey memos released at the end of last week and probably a weekend to marinate. what do you think? i don t think there was anything in there that was classified. those were his own recollections. maybe self-serving. bill: what is your summary of what you learned in there, classified for not? indictment lower case, indictment of the president if those are accurate. bill: the memos. in what sense? they are what jim comey told whatever committee he testified before. i don t remember which one it
accountable. it looks like now andrew mccabe. remember what happened at the top levels at the f.b.i. jim comey was fired. andrew mccabe was fired and potentially faces prosecution. jim baker former chief counsel at the f.b.i. demoted and reassigned. page and strzok demoted and reassigned. top people at the f.b.i. we need to get the information to get the right answers. sandra: we go to you in washington and we are always trying to get some color. some idea what is happening on the ground there. how are you feeling about your party as we re now late april heading into the fall mid-terms? i say this all the time because i mean it. if we do what we told the american people we are going to do. what they elected us to do. if we stay focused we ll be fine. when we deviate, that s when we