business. if you like, i will tell you the true back story on the russia and clinton investigations. happy to do that. i m not in the convincing business. would you like to hear what happened? just to let the audience know where we left off before the break. maria butina came up. she wanted to you come to russia to speak. you went to the federal government to tell them a russian suspicious person was telling you. this then keep it going. all true? all true. and here s the main event. from september through, of 2015 through march of 2016, i saw her. i m a 56-year-old bachelor. i said, let s every six weeks, we ll meet somewhere. you fick place. i thought it was two-thirds opportunity. this girl wanted to be a back channel for peace. she knew good liberals in russia. and she wanted two-thirds opportunity, one-third risk. because she was talking about smoozing with politicians. and she told me this guy had assigned her, whether hillary, cruz, rubio or trump won, she
bolsters some of what i m trying to say which is there is real issues. this tweet and others about the president-elect that we seem to skate over. his long, long list of potential conflicts of interest. his son meeting with russian officials. miss quinn if we could time machine back i bet if we googled christine quinn and ana navarro we would find sort of the same rhetoric questioning why donald trump would not accept the election result. hillary has accepted the election result. guys you don t understand the constitution i do know can i just say that this entire debate about whether hillary has accepted or not accepted, false. hillary is in the woods of chappaqua trying to find herself and trying to find peace. she is in the shopping mall, shopping market in chappaqua buying cheese for thanksgiving. this woman is not leading the charge for a recount effort. she has accepted this. jill stein raised $5 million, $6
come up with something as bad as that. talk about taking advantage of a situation, as if anybody in iowa s going to believe she wants iowa to win. i mean, come on. it s a classic mistake. then again, she s not a very well-prepared candidate. matt, a lot of the holiday jockeying has been between hillary clinton and donald trump. ruth marcus wrote a column, she s no conservative. i read her on a regular basis at the washington post . she wrote a column on whether hillary has opened the door for attacks on bill for his treatments of women. and it ended this way, i want to show you the last paragraph and have you react to it. but hillary clinton has made two moves that lead me, gulp, to agree with trump on the fair game front. she is smartly using her husband as a campaign surrogate, and simultaneously correctly calling trump sexist. these moves open a dangerous door. it should surprise no one that trump has barged right through it. you agree with?
that s what people hate about politics? exactly. i would have thought a month to come up with anything like that. as if anybody in iowa believes that she really wants iowa to win. come on. it s a classic mistake. then again, she s not a very well prepared candidate. matt, a lot of the holiday jockeying has been between hillary clinton and donald trump. ruth marcus wrote a column. she s no conservative. she wrote a column on whether hillary has opened the door for attacks on bill for his treatments of women. and it ended this way. i want to show you the last paragraph and have you react to it. but hill ary clinton has made to moves that lead me, gulp, to agree with trump on the fair game front. she is smartly using her husband as a campaign surrogate, and multily calling trump sexist.
this is all about whether hillary faltered. the name that you uphold earlier is joe biden. i think the party migrates to you know a leader like biden. it s interesting to me that he as not been in a discussion. that s a thing that i have heard as well. maybe it s not the current field. this race as we say, it is on. still ahead, more reaction on the passing of beau biden. plus in the wake of stunning allegations against dennis hasterd, how solid is that legal case against him?