worried these american passport-holding jihadists can come in legally. by the way, they have the ability now to produce bombs that can get through our security measures. so we re on the case trying to look for ways to stop those kinds of bombs to get on airplanes. this whole rise of isis, which is now by the way calling itself the islamic state, has become a national security threat. it was a long time ago, but it s a clear and present danger right now to the united states. yeah, how does the administration balance that against the president being very clear he wants us out of iraq? that was all part of his campaign. he s carried that out. now we have interests that are involved there with the rise of isis, the islamic state. how does the administration thread that needle? he s already sent up to 750 american military personnel. the problem is that the new vision that the president laid out at west point was about helping partners around the world.
arrest at this point for several days. can you tell us anything about what happened? well, we condemn excessive use of force. it s unacceptable in our system if police use excessive force. from what i understand about the facts of the case, this is not just an incident bystander who was pulled off a schoolyard. he was with six other people. they were masked. they through petrol bombs and molotov cocktails a the our police. three of them had knives, from what i understand. that does not excuse any excessive use of force, and our justice ministry is opening an investigation. just in the case of arab boy, we ll bring the perpetrators to justice. no one in uniform can employ excessive use of force in israel. we re a democratic society. any update into the investigation of the three young israeli men found dead earlier this week? unfortunately not. we hope that the palestinians will treat that crime with the seriousness my prime minister treated this crime of the arab boy, this heinou
three votes against it and sign bid clinton. people are still upset, which there is always a backlash. when it is 5-4, it is always controversial. on twitter, jackie brooks, asks, will this lead to more challenges of the aca that makes full implementation and enforce. law. this wasn t the law itself, it stemmed from the law. but isn t this the first bite of the app toll open other opportunity. i don t think so if she is saying would it make it full implementation possible. we are past that point. we have the big health care case of the supreme court. the statute found constitutional. do i think it could nip at the heels so to speak of this law and create controversy? yeah. and wheaton case is a good example of that. i guess i have to say that, this is a very difficult issue, right? this is not an easy question where religious liberty end and
the fact is that he talks about selective release. he is free to release the counterpoint of anything we do. when we do these reports, he s free to produce a minority report. but back to the question of releasing selectively. of course you shouldn t show your whole hand. did you ever see a u.s. attorney hand out an entire case or throw out all the transcripts? we do try to keep the american people informed. we re doing partly doing that by being on with you today because it s important they understand. conservatives were targeted for their political beliefs. progressives weren t. lois lerner broke rules. she broke the law. now two years of her e-mail are missing. all right. chairman, thank you for your time today. we know this is far from over. so we ll continue to follow it. thank you, sir. thank you. when we come back, this week the supreme court sided with hobby lobby, ruling that companies can cite religious objections and opt out of the obamacare contraception mandate. we
and they got one. there was a very lengthy dissent. i want to read a little bit of it. this came from justice sotomayor and justices ginsburg and kagan. she said, you know, we feel like there s been a switcheroo with the hobby lobby decision. those who are bound by our decisions usually believe they can take us on our word. not so today after expressly relying on the availability of the religious nonprofit accommodation to hold that the contraceptive coverage requirement violates the religious freedom restoration act as applied to closely held for-profit corporations. the court now might retreat from that position. how does that complicate the conversation now? i think both of these cases i mean, with respect to wheaton, the court was doing something very straightforward, saying essentially wheaton doesn t have to fill out the form they re bringing suit about until the case has been heard. if you look at the end of her dissent, she says, this is just not the way we normally grant a