she was a message light i this dark world. that is what she was about, sh was just a cup of love and i am like, who saw thi coming a beautiful young student gunned down. things like that just didn happen there why? who? who would want to do this? i thought i had my man. her fiance was a police officer. anyone knew how to do thi and get away with it, wouldn t it be him? then someone told polic what he saw. he told me he saw a femal that was about 5:10, she pulls off and takes off at the complex. what did she know she said i m in fear of m life the story starts to unravel. a secret tape why are you whispering? you know why. because somebody s listening. a secret lover he wanted her to come bac to him and she didn t. and a secret reveal as we re getting ready to finish up, someone hands me note who killed denita you ve told me some thing you d only admit to a priest and you can t tell me this las little piece of the puzzle. why? t
i did not do anything. you know i will find you. police were not present whe shannon recorded the calls, bu they were able to trace wher they originated from, payphone. so, there was no way to confirm that jermeir ha made them. assistant da davi sacks listen carefully to th tapes, and soon came to his ow conclusion is there any way that could be jermeir s name on the case? not that i could see, and h would have to be clearly disguising his voice to make i seem that way. it just did not sound like him at all why are you whispering? you know why. [inaudible] if he s calling t intimidate her, what is th point of discussing his voice? correct. there is no way in my mind that that was jermeir. when i heard these tapes, knew i had the right person. the crowley family wa
going on with ukraine, i wanted to know what he wanted. i asked him point blank what do you want. the president made it very clear, i just want him to do - meaning president zelensky what he campaigned on essentially rooting out corruption. there was no mention of burisma or biden or anything else. he point blank said no quid pro quo. i want to play a little bit of questioning that the ambassador had with congressman turner today on that point. no one on this planet told you that president trump was tying aid to investigations, yes or no? yes. so you really have no testimony today that ties president trump to a scheme toth withhold aid from ukraine in exchange for these investigations?ld other than my own presumption. which is nothing. shannon: congressman, you and i are both attorneys. is presumption enough in this case if you re going to remove a sitting president? is that enough? if it s a reasonable presumption, yes. to back up, it was a reasonable presumption. eve
knew about the president and ukraine was that the president was conditioning a white house meeting on the basis of the ukrainians investigating the bidens. so everything else he was hearing was the security assistance was also on the line. i use the example with the ambassador that if someone walked into the hearing room wearing rain boots or rain jacket and umbrella that had water on it, you don t need to have direct knowledge and look outside the window to see that it s raining. you can deduce or have a presumption that it s raining. so the circumstantial evidence is very, very strong.r shannon: we are talking about impeachment, something that is very divisive for the country. a that is an issue, laying a foundation of proof that convinces not only a bipartisann membership group, which i m hoping i think you guys arey helping to get there in congress, but the american people as well. jim jordan said today, as he continues to say whenever he is asked about this and gets the part o
statement. we ve heard from a lot of people, hearsay, second, third hand. why wouldn t the ambassador include that? that is a conversation with the president. the ambassador testified to that during the deposition. shannon, as you just played that clip, to remind me of something we ve all gone through. you get pulled over by a policet officer for speeding at the officer says, did you know you were speeding? and imagine if, instead of saying, no, i didn t know, or yes, i did, you said, i did not rob the bank.no what bank are you talking about? i did not drop the bank. the president was not asked by ambassador sondland is there a quid pro quo. he said, what do you want from ukraine? for some reason, the president said there is no quid pro quo. what ambassador sondland did not know when he made this ask of the president was that just days before, the president and the white house has learned the whistle-blower was alleging that indeed there was a quid pro quo. shannon: the president,