democratic party and a bad day for america. and why don t the republicans go along with what the american people want. clearly every survey out there shows they don t want the big three to be a part of this. well, there are plenty of americans who understand the big three are not sustainable. the only way to fix the problem in america financially is to make changes to the big three. we re not talking about decimating them. we re talking about making changes. anybody who tells you those programs are sustainable is a liar. and a lot of americans are not that stupid. social security is not sustainable? of course not. absolutely not. why would the age have been 65 to begin with. why? you weren t expected to live long enough to need it. duh. whatn t a the surplus in social security that we borrowed against. compared to any other program, it is far more stable than almost anything else. you don t find other program where is there might be a problem in 20, 30 years. let s fix it t
duh. whatn t a the surplus in social security that we borrowed against. compared to any other program, it is far more stable than almost anything else. you don t find other program where is there might be a problem in 20, 30 years. let s fix it today. the reality is it s fine for now. if they change it in such a way that the change comes in 10 or 20 years, maybe the eligibility level goes up to 67 years, no the with anybody who s alive now, but starting in 10 years, starting in 15 years, that s not a cave, that s actually a structural reform. if something like that is being considered, i think the president gets away with it. if they take away things that people have now, then there s going to be a political price to pay. switching subjects again, heidi, is michele bachmann fit to serve with her headaches? absolutely. i get may grains. i feel for her. i was reading the things said about her. i ve been sick on a plain, sick in offices.
democratic party and a bad day for america. and why don t the republicans go along with what the american people want. clearly every survey out there shows they don t want the big three to be a part of this. well, there are plenty of americans who understand the big three are not sustainable. the only way to fix the problem in america financially is to make changes to the big three. we re not talking about decimating them. we re talking about making changes. anybody who tells you those programs are sustainable is a liar. and a lot of americans are not that stupid. social security is not sustainable? of course not. absolutely not. why would the age have been 65 to begin with. why? you weren t expected to live long enough to need it. duh. whatn t a the surplus in social security that we borrowed against. compared to any other program, it is far more stable than almost anything else. you don t find other program where is there might be a problem in 20, 30 years. let s fix it t
long enough to need it. duh. whatn t a the surplus in social security that we borrowed against. compared to any other program, it is far more stable than almost anything else. you don t find other program where is there might be a problem in 20, 30 years. let s fix it today. the reality is it s fine for now. if they change it in such a way that the change comes in 10 or 20 years, maybe the eligibility level goes up to 67 years, no the with anybody who s alive now, but starting in 10 years, starting in 15 years, that s not a cave, that s actually a structural reform. if something like that is being considered, i think the president gets away with it. if they take away things that people have now, then there s going to be a political price to pay. switching subjects again, heidi, is michele bachmann fit to serve with her headaches? absolutely. i get may grains. i feel for her. i was reading the things said about her.