adequately test mrjohnson s conclusion? the prime minister sees it this way. i’m conclusion? the prime minister sees it this way - it this way. i m very keen for every possible it this way. i m very keen for every possible form it this way. i m very keen for every possible form of- it this way. i m very keen for| every possible form of scrutiny it this way. i m very keen for i every possible form of scrutiny and of the house can do whatever it wants to do for the all i would say is i don t think that should happen until the investigation is completed. until the investigation is completed. until the investigation is comleted. ., completed. the police are continuing their work. there completed. the police are continuing their work. there is completed. the police are continuing their work. there is senior completed. the police are continuing their work. there is senior civil i their work. there is senior civil servants are great, she is investigating 16 gathering. but the po
this is where it box? no. the opposition disagrees. this is where it gets box? no. the opposition disagrees. this is where it gets complicated. i this is where it gets complicated. here s the ministerial code again. any minister has to do so to the prime minister. that s right. the current system requires mrjohnson to reach a conclusion with a s broken the code and if he should resign. that s a problem according to peter hennessey. i resign. that s a problem according to peter hennessey. to peter hennessey. i don t think the frame of to peter hennessey. i don t think the frame of the to peter hennessey. i don t think the frame of the ministerial i to peter hennessey. i don t think the frame of the ministerial codej the frame of the ministerial code and its processing document could ve imagined that the wrong one would be the prime minister himself is up mr johnson was dispute being a wrong one. we johnson was dispute being a wrong one. 2 ., johnson was dispute being a wrong on
investigation. i not more i can say on this investigation. not more i can say on this investiuation. . ., ., , ., investigation. i have apologised for what i investigation. i have apologised for whatl not investigation. i have apologised for what i got wrong investigation. i have apologised for what i got wrong but investigation. i have apologised for what i got wrong but i investigation. i have apologised for what i got wrong but i think - investigation. i have apologised for what i got wrong but i think we - investigation. i have apologised for. what i got wrong but i think we need to wait and see what happens with the end. . v to wait and see what happens with the end. . , ., to wait and see what happens with theend. ., ,, the end. that s not the issue, prime minister, the end. .. that s not the issue, prime minister, earlier- the end. that s not the issue, prime minister, earlier today. l the end. that s not the issue, l prime minister, earlier today. let me prime ministe
new parliamentary investigation. tt9: motion at tables seems to defend new parliamentary investigation. tt9 motion at tables seems to defend the simple principle that honesty, integrity and telling the truth matter in our politics. tit integrity and telling the truth matter in our politics.- integrity and telling the truth matter in our politics. in this case the government matter in our politics. in this case the government didn t matter in our politics. in this case the government didn t oppose - matter in our politics. in this case| the government didn t oppose the motion so it passed. such is the system the prime ministers and mp5 with their majority could ve plotted had they chosen. not this time. so the investigation will start once the investigation will start once the police are finished. but whatever it finds it can t decide whatever it finds it can t decide what to do with its findings. that again is for the house of commons. which is why the bbc chris mason puts it,.. on
house of commons. and if few hours ago, you are telling your conservative mps that they had devoted to delay that until after the investigation and after the report. you have done a huge u turn stop till i do not think it is sensible to have endless analysis and investigation now before they have concluded their report. what and investigation now before they have concluded their report. what i don t want to have concluded their report. what i don t want to do have concluded their report. what i don t want to do is have concluded their report. what i don t want to do is in have concluded their report. what i don t want to do is in any way, - don t want to do is in any way, impede thousand comments from any further scrutiny and if the opposition really wants to focus on this, that s all they want to talk about, that is fine. but what i want to talk about is the stuff we are doing to take forward the uk. let’s doing to take forward the uk. let s run through where we are. lastl