romanian health care worker living in dublin. emil. why is china still living in dublin. emil. why is china still considered - living in dublin. emil. why is china still considered a - is china still considered a developing country? which cost a lot developing country? which cost a lot of developing country? which cost a lot of money and so forth. china a lot of money and so forth. china is a lot of money and so forth. china is counting for 23% of world china is counting for 23% of world emissions. here in the eu, world emissions. here in the eu, we world emissions. here in the eu, we are paying for it. thanks eu, we are paying for it. thanks very much. this refers to perhaps the most difficult issue, hanging over this summit and later in the year, the so called cop26 meeting, which is supposed to produce huge results hopefully on the issue of climate change. china accounts for 23% of world carbon pollution, says emilio. why is china still considered the developing c
investment, given its own position in the world? perhaps different from the us, the uk? no, i think there has been really no, i think there has been really quite a significant change. i think under the. indeed. change. i think under the. indeed, there was questioning whether indeed, there was questioning whether it is transatlantic credentials, as they have been historically. i think there has been historically. i think there has been a historically. i think there has been a very clear repositioning of haly been a very clear repositioning of itaiy at been a very clear repositioning of italy at the transatlantic court. of italy at the transatlantic court, and a very clear distancing from china. so, i think distancing from china. so, i think we re back to a more traditional italian foreign policy traditional italian foreign oli . ., traditional italian foreign policy. daniela, we ve heard unanimity policy. daniela, we ve heard unanimity from policy. daniela, we ve he
very serious player and will be for many years, but we need to figure out policies where together, we can work on shaping the environment for china to perhaps make some changes in the way they approach their environment. also, the courage of oliver in speaking to us from hong kong, which is really facing the blood of front of the way china has behaved in recent years. some of the reasons why they need to be seized with this issue. i can assure you when you look at the trump administration, the biden administration, the biden administration, there are so many differences it s almost night and day. one area where it is not so different is in the matter of dealing with china. we need to have a forceful response and work with others. there is no one single country that can do that, but the g7 together can. mathew, do ou think the g7 together can. mathew, do you think italy the g7 together can. mathew, do you think italy has the g7 together can. mathew, do you think italy has a the
history. we are neighbours and we want a stable relationship, yet ourjapanese territory. it is a time for democracies to have the deterrence capability increased united at the g7, and sending a clear mission is to china that it is not chinese interest to take aggressive actions to neighbourhood or east china sea. 0r actions to neighbourhood or east china sea. or to observe the international orders. but i think what we have to do now is to have the united deterrence capability and clear message to china how it can be more safe to observe international order. let s move on to our next question from the international law student, i hope i pronounce
about the role that china has, the way that china is treated by the global community in the last set of climate negotiations. i last set of climate negotiations. last set of climate neuotiations. ., ., , ., negotiations. i totally agree. china should negotiations. i totally agree. china should not negotiations. i totally agree. china should not be - negotiations. i totally agree. j china should not be enduring this status because by 2028, may the chinese. in certain technologies, the leading economy. i think it was in the past, the huge gap of gdp is a reason for their status, but wto or any other areas, i think china needs to be responsible for its own size and capability. they are the donors