the opinion it just reducedhe the court to the same level of tricks and gimmicks as the rest of politics. e rest of politics, you might expect members of congress to leak to reporters but not the court until now, you look at court a docket, you see cases involving free speech and immigration and voting rights, what is really on the docket is the role of the court. become something of a super ledg legislative body. you need 5 votes on the supreme court, 5 is easier than 51 or 251 or 18 or 80 million in a presidential race, why try to convince 80 million of your fellow americans when you could just get 5 lawyers to agree, it s easier. whesome have decided to do what is easy rather than what is right. we have another institution damaged by politics. joining us now judiciary crisis network president keri se severino. thank you for joining us, which cases will be of most significant to the viewers? you alluded to a few. one of the big ones has to do with racial preferences and e
those on the left, thatth would likeat to make itnt social, we know whater the center s they norths, absolutists, they don tt believe, they arebe relativists, you havlie seen them move, now it is normal is getting rid of the electoral college. it is why to we have two senators in each state when i they represent small s populations in idaho or wyoming? why don t we getn rid of the filibuster, bring in two states and pack the court?o because in any given day itay is i all relative and about power, they know they can t appeal to people on these issues, we get the cycle dramas, we have january 6y insurrection.he then we haven walls areosin closing in trump raid, thinth thene bombshell phantom of opera biden speech, then we splice them with jussie smollett or duke lacrosse or volleyball or covington kids, anything other than
d dispassionately down the center look at the issues, they don t h confidence in tha t process, because who in the world believes an 8 open border will oor 8 sw% incoll inflation is not inflation, who po believes you would shut down fossil fuel energy industry when we were biggest natural gas and oil producer in the world and its benefits, they have an agenda they know won t beis popular. n unless they distract peoplehe and they one of the reasons they do it is with language.lang they don t want the center,th the centere would allow free debate on both sides they t want to move io t way to thee left. trey: victor davis hanson thanyou k you so much, we canca talk about relativism when i have you back, i think it will be the death .
to many kamala harris was a far or hard left senator. but not according to media, t theyhe never refer to her thaty. way. the media tried to convincepr uses that president biden was a moderate. compared t o what? to whom? the media also told us amy coney barrett was devoutba catholic in a bad way, but nancy pelosi and joe biden were devout catholics but in a good way. w says who?me according toas what measurement?l wrpolitical writers,? is that who we re looking to? what you read someone is far right, or hard right, maybema they are. but to knobut w that you have tn know where the center is.. who gets to define that? if i candidate or elected official is far right, why
conservative butbe none ultrath liberal, seems then and now that extremists, could only be on the right according to the political writers this, r week i read stories from italy with interest their new leader was called far right. and hard right. more than anything else this week. of course, she was the firstwo woman chosen to lead italy, but thatat was buried, only historic if the other side does it.f th with media really wanted you to know is she was quote hard right or far right. that had me wondering who gets to decide what is left,or right or center, to say someone is hard or fart, right, means you know whereis right. is to know where right s you have to know where the center is. so who gets to decide that?