look, it s a tragedy, and i get that. and we re in a hugh-partisan sort of time hyper-partisan time in the country, but that doesn t mean we need to marry these two events. chris: okay. you were at the table with trump and kim at the summit. we can see you there in the foreground on the left in vietnam. and the north koreans have now said after those talks fell apart they may end all talks between the u.s. and north korea, and they may resume nuclear and missile testing. if they do so, how will the president respond? i think the resumption of the missile testing would be seen as sort of a violation of some sort of breach of trust. i think there was a general understanding that there was no reason for that to continue as long as we were continuing to have conversations, and the conversations continue. we did not get a deal in vietnam. i think those folks who thought it mightrs be easy for us to gea deal don t understand the complexities of the issue. it took reagan and gorbachev man
airepublicans who voted against the president. plus, what would you liket to a ask the panel about whether there s a split inside the gop? just go to facebook or twitter at fox news sunday, and we may use your question on the air. we know that they re always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. we re the tenney s and we re usaa members for life. call usaa to start saving on insurance today. little things can be a big deal. that s why there s otezla. otezla is not a cream. it s a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don t use if you re allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment.
well. i m thinking about what the world s going to look like in 2054 when i goat to the current age of the current president, and if we don t act aggressively and immediately on climate, it s not going to be a pretty picture. chris: are you saying, for instance, that some of the talk about retrofitting every building in america or trying to make the country carbon-free by 2030, that that s just unrealistic? we re going to have to do it chris: by 2030? if we can t do carbon-free, we ll do net carbon free, which means we re taking out as much as we re putting in. we have got to do this. this timetable isn t being set by congress, it s being set by science, and it s going to hit those deadlines are going to hit with or without us, so we have to act. what thehe green new deal gets right is it realizes there s also a lot of activity in this, retrofitting means a huge amount of building trades in this country.
problem. the discussions can and should continue. i can foresee the president and the chairman sitting down at some point in the future. but if they were to begin testing again, that would be seen as a truly disappointing turn of events. chris: and would the president have a specific response? i don t know. i m not going to speak to that. i m not going to be disappointed. he has a very good relationship with the chairman. the fact that we didn t get a deal in vietnam doesn t mean that the relationship was imperilled, it just means there was no deal to be had at that time. it doesn t mean there s not a deal in the future. chris: i want to ask you about the president s veto on friday of the resolution that congress passed blocking his declaration of a national emergency on the border. before the senateki acted, the president tweeted this: a vote for today s resolution by republican senators is a vote for nancy pelosi, crime and the open border democrats. what does the president think o