With judge jeanine pirro, harold Ford Jr. Kayleigh mcenany , greg gutfeld. Its 5 00 in new York City and ThIs Is the five. You win some, you lose some. Kamala harrIs getting humiliated again harrIs g Hu Byn Labor union while getting bailed outione by harrIs. Thec just lost the coveted endorseMent of the internationaendorsl of firefighs two weeks after the teamsters snubweeks af. Both have a long hIstory of backing democratic president iaIstory old candidates, including Joe Biden, in 2020. Neitheinr be endorsinga a candidate ThIs cycle, but donald Trump Indidate s eato the partys hIstoric advantage with Rank And File members. E so and crazy Joe Scarborough Is telling kamala to Loo K at the bright side. Not good news for the harrIs campaign. And it could have been much worse. They could have done the teachers have done in the th a republican president ,si but they did not ddent, ot do t that yesterdayha. E at least kamala can breathe a sigh of relief on that Cripplin Oatg Port strike. R
that this sort of threat of federal prosecution would have on parents exercise of their constitutional rights to be involved in their children s education. i don t believe it s reasonable to read this memorandum as chilling anyone s rights, it s about threats of violence, and it expressly recognizes the constitutional right to make arguments about your children s education. okay. i mean, look, this is the shouting and near violence that we have seen. look at that, at these school board meetings. i mean, the doj memo is not keeping parents from expressing themselves. yeah, look, you know, to paraphrase obi-wan kenobi, politics isn t my thing, and i m not going to get into the political issues here but at the end of the day, there are a number of people on the committee likely running for the presidency in two or three years, and these cultural issues
they can pass that tomorrow. they should have pass that had august. the bigger problem is what john talked about, the reconciliation bill, the build back better. what ses top number, 1.75 trillion. what s in the bill, what s not in the bill. those are key questions. you can t write a bill until you know the answers to those. right now, i think it s long past time they pass this infrastructure bill. if they would have done it in august, they probably would have had several dozen republican votes, now they ll be lucky to get ten because they have tied the two bills together, infrastructure and reconciliation. it s a hot mess. i doubt anything is going to be accomplished on reconciliation, hopefully they ll vote on infrastructure tomorrow. president biden ran as a candidate that knew how to make deals in washington, could get things done. bipartisan shim, bipartisanship, what is the damage to biden s presidency if he can t ultimately get his agenda over
committee hearings, that he has his counsel there so we see a fair, open, transparent process. and i m going to wait and see what the recommendation is of the intelligence committee, the judiciary committee, and then i ll make my decision. you know, what ses so interesting about what the president is saying and what republicans are saying, it s the same thing we ve been saying for months: there s nothing impeachable here, this is a witch hunt. reporter: okay. as you know, democrats would like to have a decision made sometime before christmas. if we re going to impeach the president, let s get that done in the house. or if we re going to censure the president, let s get that done in the house. one way or the other, we should know by then if they do choose the foreman, that means we re looking at former, that means we re looking at a senate trial sometime in january which means a very interesting winter in washington. for now, back to you. leland: in february there s those iowa cau
well, what ses going on here is very simple. this badge i wear here as a naval intelligence warfare officer that i earned when i was going through schooling for the navy, one of the things they drilled into us over and over and over again is as an intelligence officer you do not collect against u.s. persons. we re a democracy. people have an expectation of privacy. a due process. you know, domestic terrorism, it s the right term. from a legal standpoint, unless someone has comitted a crime we can t just start monitoring them, can t actually act, can t be a thought police. it s very different to talk about someone who is a threat to national security, traveled to syria, part of isis, and now trying to come back to the united states. that s where a lot of the intelligence amongst these five countries actually happens, but talking about u.s. persons acting within the united states and have not actually committed a crime, this is what we call, kendis, a gap. a real gap between what law