reporting to special counsel jack smith will square off in front of a three-judge pam of the court of appeals for the d.c. circuit. at issue whether trump has immunity for conduct he undertook as president or cannot otherwise face prosecution because it would represent double jeopardy. that s the legal issue. but what s most important here is the timing. trial court judge has determined she can t move forward until this issue is resolved. she entered an order on december 13 saying trump s appeal automatically stays any further proceedings that would otherwise move the case toward trial. but that stay could be lifted after the outcome of tuesday s argument. for sure, the losing side is going to appeal to the supreme court after perhaps first asking for the first court of the appellate court to hear the matter on bond. the losing party has 90 days to ask for supreme court review. as i detailed before, smith is eager to get trump tried before the election. trump, on the other ha
30%. and yet when donald trump is referenced, thinking back to when when he was president, generally speaking, would you say that donald trump s policies helped or hurt you personally, he s at plus 12%. analyze that data. first of all, does it comport with what you re find ing in iowa? we have not asked that identical question. what ily say is the people supportive of trump are articulate in things that i have observed that they liked the policy. thinker life was better under that. i cannot tell you that it matched what we were poll ing about him at the time he was president. so i think there s sometimes there s a halo effect on the memory of the candidate that you like that when that person was in charge, things had to have been better. via the des moines register, i read your polling