Latest Breaking News On - What goldman - Page 2 : comparemela.com
Cryptocurrency update: Bitcoin price drop prompts trading fall
markets.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from markets.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
La missione
nazioneindiana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nazioneindiana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
what reason is there to believe this proposed penalty will have a did he tesht effect? what was the total loss of the victims as result of actions? and if the sec was unable to identify the people cull tackle have culpable for the fraud, why was this? it s clear this judge is very suspicious of this deal? he s been very skeptical of many sec settlements in the past. he took a part bank of america settlement and made them redo it. how can there will be a deterrent when it s such a small part of what goldman citigroup makes. it s a fifth of what goldman sachs had to pay. how can it be a deterrent. also no one has to admit to any wrongdoing. how is it negligent? why was it not admitted fraud?
had this that said these mortgages are no good. they will not satisfy even your own standards for issuing mortgages. these are the mortgages they wrapped up into the securities, sold them off saying buy this stuff and bet against it. weren t all these mortgages being looked at by the people regulating these industries and the folks who were supposedly giving bond ratings and they got good ratings? to say that there was negligence and abuses throughout the system is in no way to ex-pull tate what goldman did. can t they point to that and say no, because they gave the information and all were culpable, and they all blew it in the most fundamental way. when i was a.g. in 2002 and 2003, i went after these companies for lying about the quality of their stocks. they said, we get it, we learned. bunk! they did it year after year because they saw a penny they could pick up. 2 1/2 years after this, no
did due diligence on the underlying mortgages, that the banks had many of the banks had this that said these mortgages are no good. they will not satisfy even your own standards for issuing mortgages. these are the mortgages they wrapped up into the securities, sold them off saying buy this stuff and bet against it. weren t all these mortgages being looked at by the people regulating these industries and the folks who were supposedly giving bond ratings and they got good ratings? to say that there was negligence and abuses throughout the system is in no way to ex-pull tate what goldman did. can t they point to that and say no, because they gave the information and all were culpable, and they all blew it in the most fundamental way. when i was a.g. in 2002 and 2003, i went after these companies for lying about the quality of their stocks. they said, we get it, we learned. bunk!
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.