he represented flynn and said the media had grossly distorted his comments. she denied flynn had end couraged violence or military insurrection but she didn t explain what flynn had men. powell spoke of removing biden from office over the weekend. we re definitely in uncharted territory. there are cases where elections have overturned but there is never been one at the presidential level, which everybody will jump to appointment out. that doesn t mean that it can t be done. it should be that he can simply be reinstated. that a new inauguration date is set. and biden is told to move out of the house. and president trump should be moved back in. the heavily criticized republican led in arizona has given followers of quoounl and the big lie hope that the
conspiracies. he s used the qanon slogan and praised it. i mean, how does somebody make an ark like he has made? it does not make sense. you ask if there is a way to reconcile it. this is irirreconcilable. there is questions whether someone that served in the military continues to receive retirement benefits as a retirement officer. general flynn receives $164,000 a year of taxpayer s money in his position as a retired and former general and the fact that he s making these kinds of comments inciting violence recommending there should be a coup to over throw the u.s. government is unconscionable and i truly believe action should be taken against general flynn. you mentioned the kind of language is dangerous. we saw that on january 6th and heard from a number of federal judges that echoed that saying
that s political pushback nonsense, but this does have to be overwhelming because it is political. if it s seen as just partisan, hamilton said expressly,hamilto just about numbers, that s not about impeachment. but rudy giuliani, this is the closest that criminal activity has potential potential criminal activity has come to this president in my observation. what you saw with michael cohen, campaign finance, what flynn and manafort and what they were doing and who they might be compromised abroad, that s both at play with rudy right next to the president. that s right. and parnas and fruman are like the holikman and ehrlichman of
as a federal agent this close in proximity of the president. flynn, remote, manafort a long time ago. here you have the two big sticks in someone that the president can t deny knowledge of efforts. how do you see it? i think you re exactly right, chris. it s not required to make the case for impeachment but it does make it a lot more convincing when you have people like giuliani who were inextricably intertwined. at the same time rudy giuliani is tied up with folks involved in criminal activity that looks like what we re talking about in the impeachment inquiry. forget about impeachment. let s say it goes somewhere, doesn t go anywhere. if you re running this case, sdny, and you re looking for potential criminality, what are
the president, it s about potential criminality. you think it s easy for the d.o.j. to go after the president s lawyer, even with an investigation? they must have facts that are pointing to rudy giuliani and we know they do. how important, how relevant, where they lead, those are the questions. andrew mccabe made these cases, okay? so he is an invaluable resource. thank you very much. now, feel free to push back, andrew, on my assertion of importance. impeachment s political. this ain t political. i have not seen the nexus of campaign finance and potential greater criminality in this point fara, having to register as a federal agent this close in proximity of the president. flynn, remote, manafort a long time ago. here you have the two big sticks in someone that the president can t deny knowledge of efforts. how do you see it?