nick was talking about all the text messages we ve seen, all of the back and forth we ve seen behind the scenes talking about how people just didn t believe that the election was stolen as they were claiming on air. but this is specifically about dominion, and the accusations that fox made against dominion, about the how they were rigged and flipping votes. is this a slam dunk case for dominion do they have enough? so i have two different answers. it s not a slam dunk because, you know, determining intent, which the jury will have to do, you know, is always risky, and a jury trial is always risky that s why lots of cases skeett, but they certainly have enough there, given what s there, that a jury could absolutely reasonably find them guilty or liable, excuse me. let me ask you about the first amendment. is this something that news organizations, even if they think what fox did was egregious
witnesses. all this, as fox faces yet another lawsuit for repeating big lie. fox investor alleges the networks of election - right in the filing quote, fox was more concerned about short term ratings and market shar then the long term damages o it s failure to tell the truth fox has not commented on the investors lawsuit, fox new denies it acted with actua malice in dominion case. joining me now, attorney chris matty he was the league lead attorney for the - one of the defamation case against alex jones also with us angelo carusone president and ceo form of medi matters. chris, thank you for much fo being with us. the libel law equivalent of the super bowl what is the standard of proo in a libel lawsuit, and why is this one just so high stakes it s a huge case, it s very difficult to prove defamation libel against a medi organization, what dominion going to have to prove is that fox news acted with actual
they got pushback, they lost their will, if any that they had, to actually report what was happening and instead it was all about the money. if anyone ever had any question about what motivates murdaugh, and what motivates everyone else, or tucker carlson, it s never a bad anything but the money. it s shameful, i think that because for fox, it is all about the money, this underscores just how important this litigation is. if they don t care about anything but money, how they react with what dominion is doing, it shows that they have actual malice, and they are deliberately putting forward lies, and that is injuring people. the injury to dominion, very clear, but the injury of the country equally devastated. from the dominion filing that we got to, it says this about the day before january 6th. it said on january 5th, rupert
and what motivates everyone else, or tucker carlson, it s never a bad anything but the money. it s shameful, i think that because for fox, it is all about the money, this underscores just how important this litigation is. if they don t care about anything but money, how they react with what dominion is doing, it shows that they have actual malice, and they are deliberately putting forward lies, and that is injuring people. the injury to dominion, very clear, but the injury of the country equally devastated. from the dominion filing that we got to, it says this about the day before january 6th. it said on january 5th, rupert and scott discussed whether hannity, carlson, and ingram should say some version of the election is over, and joe biden won? foxy eo suzanne scott told rupert that privately, they are all there. but we need to be careful about
K pameti in dejavnosti delo.si - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from delo.si Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.