This comes hours after the House Manager requested his testimony. Jamie raskin, quote you have attempted to put critical facts at issue, notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense. If you decline this invitation, we reserve any and all rights, including your refusal to testify has a strong adverse inference of action and inaction on january 6th. This comes as the clash between liars and those seeking to hold them accountable opens another phase. Fox news, phelps specifically three anchors, have been slapped with another lawsuit. And in a matter of minutes, a debate is getting under way, to determine whether the gop has any appetite to separate itself from the Conspiracy Theorist in its ranks, or the other corner, whether it wants to descend into the darkest corners of american political life and forever stain the gop with qanon Conspiracy Theories. Thats the choice. Marjorie Taylor Greene has targeted harassment for young School Shooting survivor
I lieu this one in particular groups like syrian kurds so we know now President Trump alongside ayman mohyeldin. Morning joe starts right now. Where bill barr was saying that said very clearly yesterday that because, quite honestly, they left center field. Their position had evolved when u. S. Troops would have this new back at the wall. Dont trust us. One days episode or cooperation and thats gone. It came to cooperating with a mission of securing oil in syria grand jury excuse me, between this white house and the and he talked about the importance of that mission. Cooperating with impeachment American Intelligence Community we now, weve seen the first of investigation to material over those deployments actually move materials to a grand jury. Doth not a relationship make. The judge wouldnt have any of what worries me Going Forward is he goes deep. The enemy is still going to be from here into syria, driving there. The question is, will we . Towards the region. Thats where many of the
of a 20-year count. the sort of juice, you might say, they think would be that the statute provides a person convicted under that for insurrection couldn t hold public office and that relates to the 14th amendment section 3. that has to be weighed against the qualifications for president in article 2 section 1. i am not sure that s a gimme anyway. i think those are some of the charges you would see. laura s here and she understands everything you are saying. so we are good on the panel from a technical perspective. i loved it. i loved the technicalities. we have to get into the nitty-gritty details as we get closer to a possible indictment. i do want you to react to what david said, which is on this idea of that the intent here, we know that jack smith has been looking at trump s mindset. so as a layperson, explain to me what he is looking for and how
basically burns warning the russians about any escalation, the dangers of it. so as much as we hope that this winter could provide a transition point where the two sides could begin to talk about peace, i just don t see it yet. jane harman following up on what david s talking cia director burns traveling and talking to his counter part in russia, if there were anybody that would be a key player and at least the start of negotiations from the united states side, it would be director burns, would it not. it sure would, and he met with putin personally before this ridiculous unnecessary illegal war started. but obviously to no effect. i wanted to add to what david said, which is there s no room for compromise right now. and that s the u.s. position, and lloyd austin met with his
everybody involved in this raid, best to provide a separation when he used the following and president trump made some tough decisions, hats off to him language, describing the death for that, but to call these of al-baghdadi. he died crying, screaming, whimpering, and he died like a adversaries, and say they died like a dog, and that kind of dog. given your background, given language, it is inflammatory, but it is so in contrast to what your military background, in a close quarters fire fight, given president obama said in his the noise, confusion, and the brief fairly dry nine-minute velocity of the noise in a account of the killing of osama firefight, how do you think it s bin laden. there is a fascinating passage possible that he was able to or someone was able to hear the words of al-baghdadi? in a book by ben rhodes, mr. sure, look, i agree with the president would you like toe display more footage of osama secretary. it s going to be important to bin laden s body, his burial