she called back in the mid-1990s after the alleged incident at bergdorf goodman. she and another friend, carol martin of e. jean carroll s, and she is walking the jury through what carroll told happened. she knew trump and had been to mar-a-lago to do an article at mar-a-lago and spent two nights there in the month before this alleged attack happened, and she new trump and had been to her
prove that two or more people agreed to use force to delay the execution of a law or generally or an attempt to overthrow the government. so here the claim is the january 6th insurrection that stewart rhodes was head of one of these groups was to delay the execution of the counting of votes on january 6th. now the prosecutors are helped very much by the fact that a lot of this is on video and even the secret service couldn t erase the video. so there s a lot of things that they can show the jury about the direct involvement. now the harder question is, does this extend beyond the folks that invaded the capitol actually on january six. does it reach into the trump white house, does it reach into donald trump itself? those are obviously the types of questions that the january six committee are looking at. or what carroll referred to about the secret service part, they may be looking at that as
donald trump itself? those are obviously the types of questions that the january six committee are looking at. what carroll referred to about the secret service part, they may be looking at that as well. but it is going to be hard for prosecutors to link trump at least directly with seditious conspiracy as opposed to some of the other charges that have been levied against him but for example a federal judge in california, like regular conspiracy, or obstruction of a federal proceeding. those are both federal crimes, they re both very serious, not quite as serious as can seditious conspiracy, but donald trump is facing the as well as mar-a-lago, and as well investigations in georgia and new york. he s in attracting investigations like flies. want to talk about the george investigation before i let you go. hugo, today in georgia former trump chief of staff mark meadows was supposed to testify to grand jury about efforts to overturn the 2020 election there.
order to pressure officials and overturn the government, in which case it would potentially be a crime. whpeter that s high praise froma reporter, coming from daniel goldman. he knows when he speaks about. let me ask you something about what carroll said. she doesn t remember hearing joe biden speak as forcibly or aggressively about donald trump. joe biden getting to this whole thing to be a conciliate or, he said that the country was putting down the middle. and he has been criticized by a lots of people in his own party for his conciliatory approach. the gloves seems to have come off today. but let s talk about election prospects and winning. approval ratings are still low for joe biden and for democrats for whatever reason that is. what does joe biden have to do to finish this mission of unifying this country? look, i think joe biden laid out a playing field with a speech for the path that the democrats should pursue without and throughout the rest of this mission. his speech toda
woman s call besides the fact that she is the wife of a supreme court justice? that s exactly, for starters. that s . a recusal point, it s more of a broader political mess. what carroll says is right, except there could be a code of. law issues at the supreme court justices are able to decide for themselves whether it applies. other judges cannot do that. they have ethics officers in the like. that is the core problem. and roberts can talk to them, they ve spoken in the past about having a code, but they haven t gotten one. and you are exactly right. it s part of, especially when you consider that which she is talking about is so out there, so, you know, so crazy that it puts it all together in a pretty unsavory, unsettling package. and any american has to be uneasy about the ability of her