there s two things i would say. one is it s remarkable that they ve sort of bootstrapped this. yes. they ve said we cannot we absolutely cannot confirm merrick garland who has been praised by hatch, is widely respected as a centrist jurist, et cetera. we have to keep the seat open. that becomes the reason to vote for what you just described, in your words, one of the most repellent human beings ever to run for office, is the supreme court. and now you have the escape hatch essentially being drilled into the back, which is yeah. sabrina, think about what burr is saying. i want people to be clear about this. they are suggesting essentially a dieoff on the supreme court. i want the be very clear. to say that we will keep that seat open is to say we hope the actuarial charts catch up with some of the democratic appointees and they die so things can even up. that s what s implicit in that promise. and chris, the last time you
the supreme court. this has become the red line. if hillary clinton limps into that office, you can expect this ugly campaign to be followed by years of obstructionism. the weaker she is, the more emboldened they will be to hold the line on this issue. i hear the same thing. there s two things i would say. one is it s remarkable that they ve sort of bootstrapped this. yes. they ve said we cannot we absolutely cannot confirm merrick garland who has been praised by hatch, is widely respected as a centrist jurist, et cetera. we have to keep the seat open. that becomes the reason to vote for what you just described, in your words, one of the most repellent human beings ever to run for office, is the supreme court. and now you have the escape hatch essentially being drilled into the back, which is yeah. sabrina, think about what burr is saying. i want people to be clear about this. they are suggesting essentially